Skip to main content

Security report for coolaffs.com

Other · N/A

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website coolaffs.com currently returns a 403 Forbidden error page with no accessible content, metadata, or business information. This indicates that the site is either restricted or inactive for public access. The technical infrastructure includes an nginx server with a valid SSL certificate; however, no modern TLS protocols are enabled, and security headers are minimal. There is no evidence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, nor any contact or business information available on the site. The lack of content and security best practices suggests a low digital maturity and limited operational readiness. Overall, the security posture is basic with no detected vulnerabilities but significant room for improvement in encryption protocols and security headers. The risk level is elevated due to the absence of transparency and user-facing information, which may impact trust and compliance.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching coolaffs.com

This scan found 6 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Email security
95
DNS health
85
Network security
85
Average
86
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of accessible content or metadata, no business intelligence insights can be derived from the website. There is no indication of market positioning, business model, target audience, or partnerships. The domain is registered and uses Google MX records for email, but no company-specific contact or operational details are available. This lack of information limits any assessment of competitive advantages or growth indicators.

Security posture

The security posture of coolaffs.com is minimal. The SSL certificate is valid and uses a strong 4096-bit key, but no modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) are enabled, which is a significant security gap. No HTTP security headers such as HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, or X-Frame-Options are present. DNSSEC and CAA records are not enabled, reducing domain security. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published. The site does not provide any contact channels for security issues. Overall, the site lacks essential security controls and transparency, which could expose it to risks and reduce user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 protocols to ensure secure communications
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options
  3. Enable DNSSEC and configure CAA records to protect domain integrity
  4. Publish privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and transparency
  5. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels to enhance security posture and user trust
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an nginx server with a valid SSL certificate issued by 'R11' and a strong 4096-bit key. However, the server does not support any TLS protocols, which is unusual and indicates a misconfiguration or incomplete SSL setup. The DNS records show use of GoDaddy nameservers and Google MX records for email. No CMS, frameworks, or analytics tools are detected. The website returns a 403 Forbidden error with no content, indicating restricted access or inactive site status. Performance metrics are unavailable due to lack of content. The technical setup suggests a basic infrastructure with significant modernization and configuration improvements needed to support a functional and secure website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with coolaffs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review coolaffs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.