Skip to main content

Security report for coochievideos.com

Other · N/a

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CoochieVideos.com is a recently established adult entertainment website specializing in free streaming of amateur pornographic videos focusing on female genitalia and related explicit content. The site operates primarily through advertising and affiliate marketing, linking to numerous external adult sites. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS with common web technologies such as jQuery and Font Awesome, hosted and registered via Cloudflare. The website demonstrates basic mobile optimization and moderate performance but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is weak, with no DNSSEC, security headers, or visible HTTPS enforcement in the provided data. Privacy compliance is absent, with no privacy or cookie policies, and no contact or business information is disclosed. The domain is very new, which aligns with the site's recent launch but reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site targets adults only and contains explicit NSFW content without visible compliance mechanisms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching coochievideos.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche in the adult entertainment market as an aggregator of amateur porn videos, monetized through ads and affiliate links. Its competitive advantage lies in free access to explicit content and a broad network of external adult sites. The business model relies heavily on advertising revenue and affiliate commissions. The target audience is adults seeking free adult videos. The site lacks transparency in business operations, with no clear company information or contact details. Growth indicators are limited due to the site's recent creation. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple adult affiliate programs and ad networks. Strategic observations suggest the site is focused on volume traffic and monetization rather than brand building or compliance.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is low. Key vulnerabilities include absence of DNSSEC, lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS, and no visible privacy or cookie consent mechanisms. The site uses multiple third-party ad and tracking scripts, increasing risk of malicious content injection. There is no evidence of incident response readiness or security policies. Compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations are evident due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. The site does not provide contact channels for security incidents or abuse reports. The overall security culture appears minimal, exposing the business to potential legal and reputational risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  3. Enforce HTTPS site-wide with valid SSL certificates and HSTS to protect user data.
  4. Provide clear business contact information and establish incident response contact channels.
  5. Review and audit all third-party scripts and advertising networks to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website providing free adult amateur pornographic videos focusing on female genitalia and related adult content.
Key services
Free streaming of amateur adult videos, Affiliate links to other adult sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Font Awesome 4.7.0, Google Fonts (Roboto), Cloudflare DNS and Registrar
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
ExoClick, Magsrv, Pemsrv
Marketing tools
Google Fonts, Font Awesome
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content aggregator with explicit pornographic videos.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact or business information provided.
  4. Heavy use of affiliate marketing and external adult sites.
  5. No visible security best practices implemented in headers or policies.
  6. Content is explicit and targeted to adults only.
  7. Domain is very new and registered via Cloudflare.
  8. Multiple external ad and tracking scripts present.
  9. No social media or official company contacts found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with standard web technologies including jQuery and Font Awesome. It uses Google Fonts for typography and is hosted with DNS and registrar services provided by Cloudflare. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. There is technical debt in the form of missing security best practices and incomplete compliance implementations. Modernization opportunities include upgrading security configurations, improving privacy compliance, and enhancing user experience with better navigation and responsive design.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with coochievideos.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review coochievideos.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.