Skip to main content

Security report for convergint.com

Convergint · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Convergint is a global service-based systems integrator specializing in integrated security solutions. The company positions itself as a leader in security technologies, offering cutting-edge services to enterprises worldwide. Their website reflects a professional and enterprise-grade business model targeting organizations requiring scalable and comprehensive security solutions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme, enhanced with performance optimizations like NitroPack and security features such as Google reCAPTCHA and Cookiebot for consent management. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and anti-bot mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and formal security policies are absent. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency but does not negate the professional presentation and trust signals on the site. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained but would benefit from enhanced transparency in privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching convergint.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Convergint operates in the technology sector as a service-based systems integrator focusing on security solutions. Their market position is that of a global leader, serving enterprise clients with integrated security technologies. The business model revolves around delivering tailored security services and technology integration. The company maintains an active social media presence across major platforms, reinforcing brand visibility and trust. The website content and structured data indicate a mature enterprise with consistent branding and professional communication. However, the absence of detailed WHOIS data and explicit contact information on the site suggests areas for improvement in transparency and customer engagement. No direct evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies was found, indicating Convergint operates as a standalone entity or the information is not publicly disclosed.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from automated abuse, indicating a baseline security posture. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting privacy compliance efforts. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found, which are important for enterprise-grade security transparency. The missing WHOIS data also limits trust from a domain registration perspective. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be significantly improved by adding formal security policies, headers, and disclosure channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Improve transparency by providing clear company contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security inquiries.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to ensure domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Convergint
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Convergint
Description
Convergint: Global leaders in security solutions. Explore cutting-edge technologies for a safer world.
Key services
Integrated security solutions, Security technology implementation, Global service-based systems integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, NitroPack, jQuery
Frameworks
Avada Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Cookiebot
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  5. Social media links are present and consistent with company branding
  6. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimization tools
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. WHOIS data is missing or domain is not found in the registry, which is unusual for an established enterprise
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Avada theme, a popular and modern framework for enterprise websites. It leverages Gravity Forms for form management, Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation, and NitroPack for performance optimization. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. The use of modern JavaScript libraries and asynchronous script loading contributes to fast page load times. However, the hosting provider is not explicitly identified, and no advanced security headers were detected. The technical implementation is robust but could benefit from additional security hardening and clearer contact and policy disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with convergint.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review convergint.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.