Skip to main content

Security report for controlitfactory.eu

Controlit Factory SIA · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Controlit Factory SIA is a Latvian small manufacturing company specializing in innovative conductive underlays for waterproofing inspection solutions. Their products enable roofs to be inspectable and help prevent leaks, targeting construction professionals and waterproofing contractors. The company is supported by European Regional Development Fund initiatives, indicating a credible and innovative business model. The website demonstrates a good level of digital maturity with modern tracking technologies and responsive design, although it lacks a dedicated privacy policy page and some security best practices such as security headers and vulnerability disclosure information. The security posture is moderate with HTTPS and CSRF protections but could be improved with additional headers and published policies. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in its niche market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching controlitfactory.eu

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention controlitfactory.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for controlitfactory.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on waterproofing inspection products and services. Their business model is B2B, selling specialized conductive underlays and providing inspection services supported by a mobile app. The market positioning is niche but supported by European funding programs, enhancing credibility and growth potential. The company maintains active social media channels and provides clear contact information, which supports customer engagement and trust. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The company appears to have a stable partnership ecosystem and a focus on quality and customer satisfaction.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens, indicating basic security awareness. However, no advanced security headers were detected, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact information. The absence of a privacy policy is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, which should be balanced with privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved by publishing policies, enhancing headers, and providing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and publish a security policy including incident response contacts and abuse emails.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Review and optimize tracking practices to enhance privacy compliance and transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Controlit Factory SIA
Registration number
40103987176
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Controlit Factory SIA
Description
Controlit Factory SIA specializes in manufacturing conductive underlays for waterproofing inspection solutions, enabling roofs to be inspectable and preventing leaks. They offer products like Controlit GS, Controlit PK, and related inspection services and tools.
Key services
Manufacture of conductive underlays, Inspection services, Mobile app for defect documentation, High voltage roof inspection equipment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, Swiper.js, Owl Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • CSRF tokens present in meta tags

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy policy page found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Cookie policy and terms of service pages are present and linked.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and physical address.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, and LinkedIn.
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  8. CSRF tokens present indicating some security awareness.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  10. Company supported by European Regional Development Fund.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, Swiper.js, and Owl Carousel. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and design quality. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site. Performance is moderate with room for improvement. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and language options but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The hosting provider is unknown from the data provided. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional web presence but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with controlitfactory.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review controlitfactory.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.