Skip to main content

Security report for contrastagentur.de

contrast. nicolefleischer · Other · Germany

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Contrastagentur.de is a small creative advertising agency based in Pegnitz, Germany, specializing in advertising, flyers, posters, logos, and web design services. The website is minimalistic and primarily serves as a digital business card with basic contact information and service descriptions. The market position appears to be local and focused on small business clients or individuals seeking creative advertising solutions. The business model is service-oriented without evident e-commerce or complex digital offerings. Technically, the website is built with basic HTML and CSS, hosted on servers associated with greatnet.de. There is no evidence of modern CMS usage or advanced web technologies. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features, which limits user experience on various devices. Security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and privacy or cookie policies. No forms or interactive elements are present to analyze for secure data handling. Overall, the site is functional but basic, with room for significant improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of contrastagentur.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching contrastagentur.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention contrastagentur.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for contrastagentur.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency operates in the creative advertising sector, targeting local businesses or individuals needing marketing materials such as flyers, posters, logos, and websites. The lack of detailed business information, certifications, or social media presence suggests a small-scale operation with limited digital marketing reach. The domain registration data aligns with the website content, indicating legitimacy. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. The business relies on direct contact via email and physical address. Growth indicators or revenue streams are not disclosed. The company appears to maintain a straightforward service delivery model without complex digital integrations or third-party dependencies.

Security posture

Security maturity is low. The website does not enforce HTTPS, lacks security headers, and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance in the EU. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The absence of forms reduces attack surface but also limits user engagement. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, minimizing privacy risks but also reducing business intelligence capabilities. The site would benefit from implementing HTTPS, security headers, and clear privacy documentation to improve trust and compliance. Incident response readiness and data protection officer contact details are missing, indicating gaps in security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure data transmission and improve trust.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  3. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience across devices.
  5. Consider adding secure contact forms and incident response contact information to improve engagement and security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
contrast. nicolefleischer
Description
Creative advertising agency offering services such as advertising, flyers, posters, logos, and web design.
Key services
advertising, flyers, posters, logos, web design
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple, small-scale creative advertising agency site.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact phone number or social media links provided.
  4. No forms or interactive elements present.
  5. No modern web technologies or CMS detected.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS information available.
  7. Content is minimal but relevant to business.
  8. No tracking or analytics scripts detected.
  9. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic HTML and CSS without any detected JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms. Hosting is provided by greatnet.de as inferred from the nameservers. The site lacks modern web development practices such as responsive design and accessibility features. No analytics or marketing tools are integrated. Performance is likely moderate given the simple structure but could be improved with optimization. The absence of HTTPS and security headers represents a technical risk. There is no evidence of technical debt beyond the minimalistic implementation. Modernization opportunities include adopting a CMS, implementing HTTPS, and enhancing SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 40/100High36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with contrastagentur.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review contrastagentur.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.