Skip to main content

Security report for consulting22.com

Consulting 22 - Radek Pohorský · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Consulting 22 is a small Czech marketing and advertising agency specializing in strategic marketing, offering a comprehensive range of services including marketing strategy development, analysis, content marketing, production, process management, training, corporate diagnostics, and interim/crisis management. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, targeting businesses seeking expert marketing consultancy primarily in the Prague region. Technically, the site uses established libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap, Google Fonts, and Google Tag Manager for analytics, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS implied, but lacks explicit security headers and documented incident response policies. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a detailed GDPR policy and cookie consent mechanism. However, the WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy and should be investigated further. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional business front with room for security and transparency improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching consulting22.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention consulting22.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for consulting22.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche strategic marketing consultancy with over 20 years of experience claimed by the founder. Its business model focuses on personalized, data-driven marketing strategies tailored to individual client needs. The presence of notable client references enhances credibility. Revenue streams likely derive from consulting services, training, and production facilitation. The target market includes SMEs and possibly larger firms in need of marketing optimization and crisis management. The company maintains active social media channels and a GDPR-compliant data handling approach, indicating awareness of regulatory requirements. The lack of WHOIS data and absence of terms of service or security policies may limit trust for some clients. No parent or subsidiary companies are indicated.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses common security best practices such as no visible sensitive data exposure and updated libraries. However, it lacks explicit security headers like Content Security Policy or HSTS, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The cookie consent mechanism is present and GDPR compliance is documented, which is positive. No forms are present, reducing attack surface, but also limiting interactive functionality. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration details is a notable risk factor. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by adding security headers, formal policies, and verifying domain registration.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish explicit security policies and incident response procedures on the website.
  4. Regularly update all third-party libraries and monitor for vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance security culture and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Consulting 22 - Radek Pohorský
Registration number
64766101
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Consulting 22 - Radek Pohorský
Description
Marketingová agentura se zaměření strategický marketing. Poskytujeme odborné poradenství při tvorbě marketingové komunikace.
Key services
Strategic marketing, Marketing analysis and optimization, Content marketing and copywriting, Production and graphic services, Process management, Training and seminars, Corporate diagnostics, Interim and crisis management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.2.0, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Font Awesome 4.7.0 and 5.15.3, Google Tag Manager (gtag.js)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS implied by canonical and og:url using https
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in used versions

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. No forms detected on the page; contact is via email and phone only.
  3. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn with verified URLs.
  4. Cookie consent banner present with options for analytics and ads cookies.
  5. No explicit terms of service page found.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  7. No data protection officer contact found explicitly.
  8. Website uses multiple Google Fonts and Font Awesome versions, which could be optimized.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional tech stack with jQuery 3.2.0 and Bootstrap 3.3.7, which are somewhat dated but still functional. Multiple versions of Font Awesome are loaded, which could be optimized to reduce load. Google Fonts are used extensively for typography. Google Tag Manager is implemented for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements by optimizing font loading and consolidating scripts. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and semantic HTML improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with consulting22.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review consulting22.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.