Skip to main content

Security report for constangy.com

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP · Other · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP is a large law firm specializing in labor, employment, cybersecurity, and data privacy law with over 250 attorneys across 21 states and D.C. The firm offers a broad range of legal services including employment litigation, wage and hour compliance, workplace safety, labor relations, immigration, workers’ compensation, ERISA, and cybersecurity compliance and incident response. Their market position is that of a well-established regional/national firm with a strong reputation in specialized legal areas. Technically, the website is built on a modern platform with good performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility. It uses standard web technologies and integrates analytics and marketing tools responsibly. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers are not explicitly visible. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern but the website's professional presentation and active content suggest legitimacy. Overall, the firm demonstrates a mature digital presence aligned with its business objectives.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching constangy.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm targets employers and legal professionals needing specialized labor and employment law services, including cybersecurity and data privacy compliance. Their business model is service-based, generating revenue through legal consulting and litigation. The firm maintains a strong partnership ecosystem, including payment processing via LawPay and website services via Firmseek. Growth indicators include active content updates, webinars, and a large attorney base. The firm leverages social media and multimedia content to engage clients and prospects. Their competitive advantage lies in their comprehensive legal expertise and geographic coverage. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a controlled client intake process via forms.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and provides cookie consent with management options, indicating compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, no explicit security policy or incident response contact information is found. Security headers like CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options are not detected in the HTML source, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified. The use of third-party scripts (Google Analytics, Lfeeder) is standard but should be regularly audited. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adding explicit security headers and incident response details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Consider adding direct company contact emails and phone numbers in a controlled manner to improve client accessibility.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing compliance with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP
Description
Constangy has more than 250 attorneys across 21 states and D.C., handling employment litigation, wage and hour, workplace safety, labor relations, immigration, workers’ comp, ERISA, and cybersecurity compliance, incident response, and litigation.
Key services
Appellate, Cybersecurity & Data Privacy, Employment Litigation Prevention & Defense, Immigration, Investigations, Labor Relations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Video embedding, Web fonts (PT Sans, PT Serif), Firmseek platform
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with management options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with autocomplete off

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Lfeeder
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Lfeeder
Marketing tools
Lfeeder
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong focus on labor, employment, and cybersecurity legal services
  3. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with user consent mechanisms
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible on homepage; contact via forms
  5. Social media presence on major platforms with verified company pages
  6. No security.txt or explicit incident response contact found
  7. No visible security headers in HTML source
  8. Modern web technologies and good SEO practices observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and web fonts, hosted on a platform provided by Firmseek tailored for legal firms. Performance is fast with preloading of fonts and images, and the site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data describing the organization. The site integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. No CMS like WordPress or Drupal is detected; the site appears custom-built or uses a specialized legal platform. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by adding security headers and ensuring third-party scripts are secure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with constangy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review constangy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.