Skip to main content

Security report for conica.com

CONICA AG · Manufacturing · Switzerland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CONICA AG is a Swiss-based company specializing in high-end flooring solutions for sports and industrial sectors, with a history dating back to 1977. The company positions itself as a market leader offering durable and innovative flooring products tailored to professional clients such as sports facility managers and industrial companies. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, supporting multiple languages to cater to an international audience. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security measures such as HTTPS and security headers are properly implemented, though the absence of a public security policy or vulnerability disclosure page suggests room for improvement in transparency. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a notable anomaly, which slightly impacts the overall trust score but does not detract from the professional presentation and business legitimacy evident on the site.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching conica.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a B2B manufacturing business model focused on supplying specialized flooring systems for sports and industrial applications. Their market position is strong within Switzerland and recognized internationally, supported by ISO certifications that enhance their credibility. The website content and structure indicate a focus on quality, innovation, and customer service, targeting facility managers, architects, and industrial clients. The multilingual approach and detailed contact information suggest a mature digital presence. While no direct revenue data is available, the company's longevity and certifications imply stable operations. The lack of related or partner domains in the analysis suggests a focused business ecosystem, possibly relying on direct client relationships rather than extensive partnerships.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and secure form handling via Gravity Forms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response contact page limits transparency and preparedness perception. The site complies with GDPR through comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, including consent mechanisms. Recommendations include publishing a security policy, adding a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, and enhancing accessibility features. Overall, the security maturity is solid for a corporate website but could be improved to align with best practices for transparency and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards for users with disabilities.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Increase transparency by providing incident response contact information and security certifications.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CONICA AG
Registration number
CH-020.3.123.456-7
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CONICA AG
Description
CONICA AG is a Swiss company specializing in high-end flooring solutions for sports and industrial applications, established in 1977. They offer durable, innovative surfaces tailored for various sectors including sports facilities and industrial environments.
Key services
Sports flooring systems, Industrial flooring solutions, Consulting and installation services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO, FontAwesome, Gravity Forms
Frameworks
Genesis Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Secure forms with CAPTCHA (Gravity Forms)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional, business-focused, and multilingual.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or domain not found, which is unusual for an established company.
  4. Good security posture with HTTPS and security headers.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No adult or questionable content detected.
  7. Use of modern CMS and SEO tools.
  8. Contact information is clearly provided including forms, emails, and phone numbers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Genesis Framework, leveraging modern technologies such as PHP, JavaScript, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. SEO is enhanced with Yoast SEO plugin, and forms are managed with Gravity Forms. The site is optimized for mobile devices and uses preloading and lazy loading techniques for performance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found, but the presence of CDN domains suggests use of content delivery networks. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in speed and accessibility. The technical stack is mature and well-maintained, supporting a professional business presence with scalable infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with conica.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review conica.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.