Skip to main content

Security report for confidentliving.se

Other · Sweden

Partial score · DNS & email only

69/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website confidentliving.se currently serves minimal content, primarily a 404 error page with a product list block, indicating the main content is not accessible or missing. The domain is registered since 2008 with a Swedish registrar, consistent with the domain's country code and presumed business location. The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare DNS services but lacks DNSSEC and visible HTTPS or security headers in the provided data. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact or security incident response information is available, which limits compliance and trustworthiness. Overall, the website appears to be either under maintenance or improperly configured, resulting in poor user experience and low content quality.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching confidentliving.se

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
69

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the minimal content and lack of business information on the website, detailed business intelligence is limited. The domain age suggests an established presence, and the use of Cloudflare indicates some level of infrastructure investment. However, absence of contact details, policies, or certifications limits insights into market positioning, business model, or partnerships. The website likely targets Swedish consumers given the domain and registrar location, but no explicit services or products are described in the accessible content.

Security posture

The security posture is weak based on the available data. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement, security headers, or vulnerability disclosures. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing risks. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates non-compliance with GDPR best practices. The website does not appear to be protected by a WAF or similar security mechanisms, but the minimal content and lack of forms reduce immediate attack surface. Overall, the site requires significant improvements to meet modern security and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to enhance trust and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and appears to be a 404 error page with a product list block.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or security policies are present.
  4. No scripts or analytics detected in the provided HTML content.
  5. Domain is active, registered since 2008, and uses Cloudflare DNS but DNSSEC is not enabled.
  6. No evidence of adult or explicit content.
  7. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  8. Website lacks SEO and accessibility features.
  9. Technical and security posture is weak due to minimal content and missing security headers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Cloudflare DNS services but lacks DNSSEC and visible HTTPS or security headers in the provided HTML snippet. The content is minimal and indicates a 404 error page, suggesting either broken links or misconfiguration. No CMS or frameworks are detected from the HTML content. The site performance and mobile optimization cannot be fully assessed due to limited content. SEO and accessibility features are absent or minimal. The technical infrastructure requires modernization and proper configuration to improve user experience and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with confidentliving.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review confidentliving.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.