Skip to main content

Is concrete.org a Scam? Security Check Results - American Concrete Institute

concrete.org Security Report Summary

concrete.org received a security score of 52 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Elevated Risk". This report covers American Concrete Institute's website security posture. American Concrete Institute operates in the Manufacturing industry in United States.

The American Concrete Institute (ACI) website for the Western Europe region serves as a professional portal providing access to standards, educational programs, certification, and technical resources related to concrete design and construction. The organization is positioned as a global authority in the concrete industry, targeting professionals and organizations involved in concrete materials and construction. The website content is relevant and well-structured, supporting the business model of standards development and education. Technically, the site is built on ASP.NET WebForms and uses the DotNetNuke CMS platform. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Bing Ads. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices but has basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in modernizing the tech stack and enhancing security headers. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies on the analyzed page. There is no evidence of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. The WHOIS data is malformed and missing critical registration details, which reduces domain trustworthiness despite the professional appearance of the website. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, improved security practices, and transparent domain registration information to strengthen trust and compliance posture.

The security scan identified 30 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads, jQuery, ASP.NET WebForms.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and business-context intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

concrete.org favicon

Is concrete.org Safe? Security Analysis for American Concrete Institute

https://www.concrete.org/

Check if concrete.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingUnited Stateslarge
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityLinkedIn Insight TagHotjarGoogle Tag Manager+3 more
Analyzed Completed
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

Above Manufacturing avg (52)

GDPR-aligned

Data handling

EU

Hosting region

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional Report

Unlock the full report for concrete.org

Professional PDF, email delivery, and optional intelligence add-ons. One-time purchase, lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

AI Summary

The American Concrete Institute (ACI) website for the Western Europe region serves as a professional portal providing access to standards, educational programs, certification, and technical resources related to concrete design and construction. The organization is positioned as a global authority in the concrete industry, targeting professionals and organizations involved in concrete materials and construction. The website content is relevant and well-structured, supporting the business model of standards development and education. Technically, the site is built on ASP.NET WebForms and uses the DotNetNuke CMS platform. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Bing Ads. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices but has basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in modernizing the tech stack and enhancing security headers. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies on the analyzed page. There is no evidence of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. The WHOIS data is malformed and missing critical registration details, which reduces domain trustworthiness despite the professional appearance of the website. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, improved security practices, and transparent domain registration information to strengthen trust and compliance posture.

Detected Technologies

Google AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityLinkedIn Insight TagHotjarGoogle Tag ManagerBing AdsjQueryASP.NET WebForms

10 urgent findings need attention

10 high

  • + 2 more findings in the full report below
Continuous monitoring

Keep concrete.org under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for concrete.org.

OffSeq Observations

No critical findings yet

66/100

Network Security

1 finding

20/100

Email Security

3 findings

85/100

DNS Health

2 findings

85/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

ACI holds a strong market position as a leading standards and educational body in the concrete industry. Its business model focuses on membership, certification, and dissemination of technical knowledge. The website supports this by offering membership information, educational resources, and regional portals. The extensive use of tracking and marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing approach aimed at engagement and lead generation. However, the absence of clear contact information and privacy policies on this page may hinder user trust and regulatory compliance. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a notable gap in business credibility. The organization targets professionals, students, and organizations in construction and materials sectors, leveraging a global network. The site’s content and structure reflect a large enterprise with consistent branding and a focus on technical authority. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not explicitly identified in the provided data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks, especially without clear cookie consent mechanisms. No published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs were found, indicating potential gaps in security governance and transparency. The malformed WHOIS data further complicates trust verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in headers, privacy compliance, and transparency to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

Comprehensive website and business-context analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

American Concrete Institute

Description:

The American Concrete Institute (ACI) is a leading authority and resource worldwide for the development and distribution of consensus-based standards, technical resources, educational programs, certification programs, and proven expertise for individuals and organizations involved in concrete design, construction, and materials, who share a commitment to pursuing the best use of concrete.

Key Services:
Consensus-based standards developmentTechnical resourcesEducational programsCertification programs
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityLinkedIn Insight TagHotjarGoogle Tag ManagerBing AdsjQueryASP.NET WebForms
Frameworks:
ASP.NET
Platforms:
Windows Server (likely)Microsoft IIS (likely)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityHotjarLinkedIn Insight TagBing Ads
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Bing AdsLinkedIn Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Microsoft ClarityHotjarLinkedIn Insight TagBing Ads
Marketing Tools:
HotjarMicrosoft Clarity
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF.

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the concrete.org security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Weak X-Frame-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "SAMEORIGIN, SAMEORIGIN"

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phoneform

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete concrete.org security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:12.148.47.128/25 ip4:169.60.155.192/28 ip4:108.168.158.20 ip4:108.168.158.18 ip4:216.234.97.16 ip4:216.234.97.24 ip4:199.231.54.232 ip4:216.33.126.11 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:sendgrid.net include:informz.net -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:[email protected]
Forensic Reports:[email protected]

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

47/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 57 days

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

41 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
27 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(206 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:169.60.155.199
Name Servers:
ns10.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns11.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns12.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns13.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns14.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns15.dnsmadeeasy.com
MX Records:
0: concrete-org.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2009010573, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:30ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:12.148.47.128/25 ip4:169.60.155.192/28 ip4:108.168.158.20 ip4:108.168.158.18 ip4:216.234.97.16 ip4:216.234.97.24 ip4:199.231.54.232 ip4:216.33.126.11 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:sendgrid.net include:informz.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: RPC

HIGH

Port 135 (RPC) is publicly accessible - RPC - Windows RPC endpoint

How does concrete.org compare?

See how concrete.org stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a mature but somewhat dated technology stack including ASP.NET WebForms and DotNetNuke CMS. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, which indicates a focus on user engagement and data-driven marketing. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, but accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced.
Performance is moderate, with potential improvements by optimizing scripts and modernizing the platform. The lack of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs but would benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Professional Report

Download the concrete.org report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

Scan your own website

Liked the concrete.org report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about concrete.org

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website