Skip to main content

Security report for concordia.ee

Advokaadibüroo Concordia · Other · Estonia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Advokaadibüroo Concordia is an established Estonian law firm founded in 2010, providing legal services primarily in Estonia and across the European Union through its membership in the European Law Firm network. The firm targets clients requiring professional legal representation and consulting services with a cross-border reach within the EU. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact details and multilingual support (Estonian and English). Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Laravel Livewire, Alpine.js, jQuery, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. The site is hosted by Zone Media OÜ, a known Estonian hosting provider, and uses HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility features are basic. SEO is implemented at a basic level with meta tags and Open Graph properties. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement, CSRF token usage, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which could be improved to enhance security posture. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained with a strong domain registration history consistent with the business claims. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing formal security and incident response policies, and adding a vulnerability disclosure page to improve transparency and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching concordia.ee

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Advokaadibüroo Concordia operates as a small-sized law firm in Estonia, leveraging its membership in the European Law Firm network to extend its service offerings across the EU. The firm’s business model focuses on providing legal consulting and representation services, targeting clients who require cross-border legal expertise. The website content and structure indicate a focus on professionalism and client trust, supported by clear contact information and compliance with privacy regulations. The firm’s partnership ecosystem includes the European Law Firm network, enhancing its market position. Growth indicators are not explicitly stated but the domain age and network membership suggest stable operations. The absence of social media links may indicate a traditional client acquisition approach.

Security posture

The website’s security posture is solid with mandatory HTTPS and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. The presence of CSRF tokens indicates awareness of common web vulnerabilities. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security hardening. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which may impact the firm’s readiness to handle security incidents. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements, demonstrating compliance with privacy regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding social media or professional networking links to improve business visibility and client engagement.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Advokaadibüroo Concordia
VAT number
EE100730092
Registration number
10820483
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Advokaadibüroo Concordia
Description
Advokaadibüroo Concordia is a law firm and a member of the European Law Firm network, providing legal services across all European Union member states.
Key services
Legal representation, Consulting, Cross-border legal services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Alpine.js, Livewire, Google reCAPTCHA, Moment.js, DateRangePicker, LightGallery
Frameworks
Laravel Livewire
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration
  • CSRF token present in meta tags
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Estonian with English language option available.
  3. Clear contact information including phone, email, and physical address is provided.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with user preferences.
  5. No explicit terms of service page found.
  6. Security practices include HTTPS, CSRF tokens, and Google reCAPTCHA.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business claims.
  9. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks.
  10. No social media links detected in the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern technology stack featuring Laravel Livewire for reactive components, Alpine.js for frontend interactivity, and jQuery for legacy support. It uses Google Fonts and CDN-hosted libraries such as Moment.js and DateRangePicker for enhanced UI functionality. Google reCAPTCHA is integrated for bot mitigation. Hosting is provided by Zone Media OÜ, a reputable Estonian hosting provider. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and deferred JavaScript to optimize page load. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and viewport meta tags. SEO is basic but present, with meta descriptions and Open Graph tags, though some OG fields are empty. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or framework-based implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with concordia.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review concordia.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.