Skip to main content

Security report for compliance.gr

Σύνδεσμος Επαγγελματιών Κανονιστικής Συμμόρφωσης Ελλάδος (ΣΕΚΑΣΕ) · Other · Greece

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website compliance.gr represents the official Greek professional association for regulatory compliance officers, known as ΣΕΚΑΣΕ. It serves as a hub for information dissemination, education, and collaboration within the compliance sector in Greece. The site offers membership information, news, events, and partnerships, notably with the International Compliance Association (ICA). The content is primarily in Greek and targets professionals in the compliance field. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern plugin ecosystem supporting membership management, cookie compliance, and event booking. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is properly managed, but there is no explicit security policy or incident response contact information published. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching compliance.gr

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association holds a strong market position as the official body for compliance professionals in Greece, providing continuous updates, educational programs, and networking opportunities. Its business model revolves around membership fees and partnerships, such as with ICA, offering members discounted access to training. The website content and structure support this model effectively. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication via contact forms. The site’s partnership ecosystem is limited but focused on relevant compliance education providers. Growth indicators include regular news updates and events. Strategic observations include the opportunity to enhance transparency by publishing security and incident response policies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of published security policies and incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness perception. Security headers are not explicitly detected, which could improve defense-in-depth. The use of reputable WordPress plugins reduces risk but requires ongoing monitoring. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Σύνδεσμος Επαγγελματιών Κανονιστικής Συμμόρφωσης Ελλάδος (ΣΕΚΑΣΕ)
Description
Ο Σύνδεσμος Επαγγελματιών Κανονιστικής Συμμόρφωσης Ελλάδος (ΣΕΚΑΣΕ) είναι το επίσημο σωματείο στελεχών Κανονιστικής Συμμόρφωσης στην Ελλάδα, με έδρα την Αθήνα. Προάγει και διαδίδει το πλαίσιο λειτουργίας της Κανονιστικής Συμμόρφωσης και ενισχύει το ρόλο των Υπευθύνων αυτής στο ελληνικό επιχειρηματικό περιβάλλον.
Key services
continuous information updates, educational programs, collaboration with ICA, events and conferences, newsletters
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, PHP, jQuery, Swiper.js, Complianz GDPR plugin, Contact Form 7, Indeed Membership Pro, bbPress, Booking plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Complianz)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Greek language targeting compliance professionals.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms are implemented.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact form is primary contact method.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  6. Use of modern WordPress plugins and technologies with moderate performance.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3, leveraging a range of plugins including Complianz GDPR for cookie management, Contact Form 7 for forms, Indeed Membership Pro for membership handling, and bbPress for forums. The front-end uses jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses Google Analytics for tracking. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site structure and meta tags support SEO well. Technical risks are minimal but depend on plugin maintenance and security header implementation. Hosting provider details are not disclosed in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with compliance.gr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review compliance.gr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.