Skip to main content

Security report for comparaiso.cl

Selectra · Telecommunications · Chile

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Comparaiso.cl is a Chile-based online platform specializing in comparing telecommunications services including internet, mobile, fixed phone, and television plans. It operates under the parent company Selectra, providing consumers with comprehensive options to select the best plans suited to their needs. The website is well-positioned in the Chilean market, partnering with major telecom providers and offering additional services such as speed tests and streaming platform information. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10, integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, and uses Cloudflare DNS, reflecting a modern and maintainable infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is good, with clear privacy and cookie policies linked to the parent domain. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy front to users, with clear contact channels and consistent branding.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching comparaiso.cl

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
40
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention comparaiso.cl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for comparaiso.cl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model focuses on generating value by aggregating and comparing telecom offers, likely monetizing through affiliate partnerships or lead generation. The target audience is Chilean consumers seeking telecom services, with a medium-sized operation founded in 2020. The company leverages its parent company Selectra's resources and reputation to maintain market presence. The site’s partnerships with major telecom companies and comprehensive content offerings provide competitive advantages. Growth potential exists through expanding service comparisons and enhancing user engagement tools. The ecosystem includes related domains under Selectra, indicating a structured partnership and brand strategy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, or HSTS is a gap that should be addressed to enhance protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy pages were found, which could be improved to demonstrate security governance. The site does not expose forms on the homepage, reducing attack surface. Overall, the security risk is low but can be improved with standard best practices and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information.
  3. Regularly audit Drupal modules and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Expand transparency on data retention and user privacy practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Selectra
Description
Comparaiso Chile offers comparison services for internet, mobile, fixed phone, and television plans in Chile, helping users find the best offers and coverage.
Key services
Internet plan comparison, Mobile plan comparison, Television plan comparison, Streaming platform information, Speed test tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Tag Manager, intl-tel-input
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to Chilean telecom consumers.
  3. Clear contact phone number is provided prominently.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked to a reputable parent domain.
  5. Use of modern CMS (Drupal 10) and integration with Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content; potential area for improvement.
  7. No visible forms collecting personal data on the homepage; contact primarily via phone.
  8. Multiple external links to telecom providers and related services.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Drupal 10 CMS, a robust and widely supported platform, ensuring maintainability and security updates. Integration with Google Tag Manager enables flexible analytics and marketing tracking. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets, including intl-tel-input for phone input formatting, indicating attention to user input validation. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare DNS, improving DNS security and performance. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in lazy loading images and minimizing render-blocking resources. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and Open Graph data. Mobile optimization is good, supporting responsive design. Technical risks are minimal but include potential outdated Drupal modules and missing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with comparaiso.cl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review comparaiso.cl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.