Skip to main content

Security report for cologniapress.com

Colognia press, a.s. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Colognia press, a.s. is a well-established printing company based in the Czech Republic, specializing in self-adhesive labels, flexible packaging, laminate printing, and other specialized printing services. With over 27 years of experience, it holds a strong market position in Central Europe, serving a broad B2B customer base. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with multilingual support and detailed product and service information. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers and policies could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, but the overall business credibility and content quality are high.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cologniapress.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
90
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cologniapress.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for cologniapress.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector focused on printing and packaging solutions, targeting businesses across Europe. Its competitive advantage lies in innovation, a broad product portfolio, and strong customer service. The business model is B2B with a focus on custom orders and high-quality production. The company has won industry awards such as the WorldStar Award 2022, indicating recognition in the field. The website's detailed references, certifications, and client zones suggest a mature operation with ongoing customer engagement and growth potential.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent, and use of reputable analytics and marketing tools. However, it lacks visible security headers like Content-Security-Policy and does not publish a security policy or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data is a potential red flag for domain legitimacy but does not directly impact website security. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and compliance with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve trust and legitimacy perception.
  5. Continue to monitor and optimize website performance and accessibility to maintain excellent user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Colognia press, a.s.
Registration number
26186292
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Colognia press, a.s.
Description
Colognia press patří mezi nejinovativnější tiskárny ve střední Evropě s portfoliem produktů zahrnujícím samolepicí etikety, flexibilní obaly, shrink sleeve obaly, potisk laminátů i speciální tisky z role na míru klientům.
Key services
Samolepicí etikety (self-adhesive labels), Flexibilní obaly (flexible packaging), Potisk laminátů (laminate printing), Shrink sleeve obaly, Specialized roll printing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Smartlook, Alpine.js, Tailwind CSS, Custom JavaScript
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Smartlook
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Smartlook
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language
  2. Strong focus on printing and packaging industry
  3. Multiple language options available (CS, EN, DE)
  4. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  5. No visible security or malware issues
  6. WHOIS data missing or domain not found in public WHOIS
  7. Social media presence on Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn
  8. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content
  9. Contact phone number and physical address clearly displayed
  10. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern front-end technologies including Alpine.js and Tailwind CSS, combined with Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Smartlook for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data. The site has a clean structure with proper meta tags and SEO optimizations, contributing to good search engine visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cologniapress.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cologniapress.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.