Skip to main content

Security report for collectivitedemartinique.mq

Collectivité Territoriale de Martinique · Government · Martinique

Partial score · DNS & email only

64/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Collectivité Territoriale de Martinique website serves as the official digital presence of the regional government authority of Martinique. It provides residents and stakeholders with access to administrative acts, aid programs, calls for candidatures, cultural events, and satellite information. The site is designed primarily for the French-speaking population of Martinique and aims to facilitate public service information dissemination. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder, leveraging modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, FontAwesome, and jQuery. It employs Matomo analytics configured for privacy and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating a commitment to GDPR compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a professional and consistent branding aligned with government standards. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms but lacks several advanced security headers and a public vulnerability disclosure policy. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain registration transparency, but the official branding and social media presence support its legitimacy. Overall, the site maintains a moderate security posture with room for improvement in security headers and incident response readiness. The overall risk assessment is low, with recommendations to enhance security headers, implement a security.txt file, and improve accessibility features to strengthen compliance and trust. The website is suitable for its public service role and demonstrates a good balance between usability, privacy, and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching collectivitedemartinique.mq

This scan found 11 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
64

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Collectivité Territoriale de Martinique operates as a government entity providing essential public services and information to the residents of Martinique. Its market position is that of an official regional authority, with no direct commercial competition. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on governance, public administration, and community engagement. Revenue streams are likely government-funded, with no commercial transactions on the site. Target customers include local citizens, businesses, and public sector stakeholders seeking information on aid programs, administrative procedures, and cultural events. The website's partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms for outreach and Cookiebot for compliance. Growth indicators include regular updates on news and events, reflecting active engagement. Strategic observations highlight the importance of digital accessibility and security enhancements to maintain public trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a foundational security posture with HTTPS enforced and privacy-respecting analytics. However, the lack of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options exposes potential risks to clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and cross-site scripting attacks. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency and incident response readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Cookie consent is implemented with blocking mode, enhancing user privacy. The site would benefit from adopting additional security best practices, including enhanced header configurations, regular security audits, and public disclosure channels to improve resilience and stakeholder confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve incident response.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance and transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Collectivité Territoriale de Martinique
Description
Official government website for the Territorial Collectivity of Martinique, providing information on administrative acts, aid programs, calls for candidatures, and cultural events.
Key services
Dispositifs et Aides (Aid programs), Actes Administratifs (Administrative acts), Appels à candidatures (Calls for candidatures), Evènements culturels (Cultural events), Information on satellites and projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Elementor 3.32.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap 5 (via Download Manager plugin), FontAwesome 6.2.0, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with blocking mode
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in French and targeted at Martinique residents.
  3. Site uses WordPress with Elementor and several plugins.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the visible HTML; contact page likely exists but not parsed here.
  6. Social media links to official Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and LinkedIn accounts.
  7. No forms detected in the main HTML content provided.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  9. No terms of service page clearly identified.
  10. SSL is enabled and site loads over HTTPS.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with Elementor as the primary page builder, supported by Bootstrap and FontAwesome for styling and icons. It uses jQuery for JavaScript functionality and Matomo for analytics, configured to respect user privacy. Cookiebot manages cookie consent with automatic blocking, indicating a mature approach to privacy compliance. Performance is moderate, with some large images and multiple CSS/JS assets loaded. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements present. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags and canonical links but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with collectivitedemartinique.mq. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review collectivitedemartinique.mq.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.