Skip to main content

Security report for codevibrant.com

Codevibrant · Technology · Nepal

Partial score · DNS & email only

43/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Codevibrant is a small technology company specializing in WordPress themes and plugins, offering customizable and user-friendly web solutions primarily targeting WordPress users and businesses seeking web development services. The company has been operational since 2017 and maintains a professional online presence with a focus on SEO and user experience. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Easy Digital Downloads, and various performance and UI libraries. The site is optimized for mobile and SEO, with fast loading times and clear navigation. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and standard domain protections, though improvements such as enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers are recommended. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but lacking a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid business credibility and technical maturity suitable for its market niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 4 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching codevibrant.com

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
43

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Codevibrant operates in the competitive WordPress theme and plugin market, leveraging a business model based on digital product sales and web development services. Their competitive advantage lies in offering highly customizable and SEO-optimized themes compatible with popular page builders. The company targets WordPress users ranging from bloggers to e-commerce businesses. Their partnership with Freemius for payment processing indicates a mature e-commerce setup. Growth indicators include a user base of over 50K and active blog content. The company maintains social media channels for marketing and customer engagement. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing privacy compliance and security policies to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could be exploited. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms is a positive control against automated abuse. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. Compliance with GDPR is claimed but lacks full implementation of cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhancements in DNS security, HTTP headers, and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve overall DNS security.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to fully comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users to improve trust and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and third-party scripts to minimize vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Codevibrant
Description
CodeVibrant is a web development company that offers the user to develop their dream website. They offer services on various platforms like WordPress.
Key services
WordPress themes, WordPress plugins, Web development services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, PHP (implied by WordPress), jQuery, Easy Digital Downloads, WooCommerce compatibility, Google Analytics, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket (lazy loading scripts), Font Awesome, Sequence.js, LightSlider, Isotope, WOW.js, Counter-Up
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
WPFomify
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional WordPress theme and plugin provider
  2. Content is well structured and SEO optimized
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact likely via forms
  4. No cookie consent banner detected despite GDPR compliance claim
  5. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published
  7. Domain is stable and consistent with business claims
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform version 6.8.3, utilizing a variety of JavaScript libraries and plugins such as jQuery, Easy Digital Downloads, WooCommerce compatibility, and UI enhancement tools like Sequence.js and LightSlider. Performance optimizations include lazy loading scripts and resource prefetching. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses Yoast SEO for metadata management. Hosting details are not explicit but domain registration is via NameCheap. The technical implementation is robust with good SEO and accessibility basics, though there is room for improvement in security headers and privacy mechanisms. The site demonstrates low technical debt and good modernization practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 49/100High25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with codevibrant.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review codevibrant.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.