Skip to main content

Security report for cobrasecurity.cz

Cobra Security s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cobra Security s.r.o. is a Czech-based security agency specializing in professional protection of property and persons, operating since 1995. The company serves primarily local clients in several Czech districts with a focus on quality and experienced personnel. Their services include electronic security system installation, servicing, and operation of a centralized protection panel with rapid response units. The website content is primarily in Czech and targets local customers seeking security services. Technically, the website uses a CMS called inPage with common libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap, and includes a cookie consent mechanism with CAPTCHA-protected contact forms. However, the site lacks visible privacy and terms of service pages, and no WHOIS data is publicly available for the domain, which reduces trustworthiness. Security headers and HTTPS status could not be verified from the provided data, indicating room for improvement in security posture. Overall, the website is functional with basic content quality and moderate technical implementation but requires enhancements in privacy, security, and transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cobrasecurity.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a trusted local security provider with a long history and a focus on quality over quantity compared to multinational competitors. Their business model revolves around providing physical and electronic security services to clients in specific Czech regions. The website links to partner domains related to weapons and security training, indicating a partnership ecosystem. The company provides clear contact information and legal details, supporting business credibility. However, the absence of privacy and terms policies and missing WHOIS data may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a niche market focus and stable local presence.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate but incomplete. The website uses CAPTCHA on forms and a cookie consent banner, indicating some awareness of security and privacy. However, no security headers were detected, and HTTPS status is unknown, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing attacks. The lack of privacy and security policies and absence of incident response contacts suggest gaps in compliance and readiness. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the security maturity is basic, with recommendations to implement HTTPS, security headers, and comprehensive privacy and security documentation to enhance protection and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.
  4. Enhance WHOIS registration information to improve domain trustworthiness and legitimacy.
  5. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact information for security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Cobra Security s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ27600220
Registration number
27600220
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cobra Security s.r.o.
Description
Cobra Security s.r.o. is a Czech security agency providing professional protection of property and persons since 1995. They offer comprehensive services including electronic security systems installation and servicing, operate their own centralized protection panel (PCO), and have rapid response units in several Czech districts. The company emphasizes quality, experienced personnel trained in law, tactics, self-defense, and shooting, with a focus on trustworthiness and physical fitness.
Key services
Protection of property and persons, Electronic security systems installation and servicing, Centralized protection panel operation, Rapid response intervention units
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5, Bootstrap 5.1, Photoswipe, Magic Grid, jQuery Cookie
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of CAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Czech language targeting local Czech clients.
  2. No privacy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented with detailed options.
  4. Contact form uses CAPTCHA for spam prevention.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or not publicly available, which is unusual.
  7. Website uses a CMS called inPage.
  8. No explicit security headers or HTTPS status provided.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond cookie consent scripts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the inPage CMS platform and uses modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery 3.5 and Bootstrap 5.1, along with Photoswipe and Magic Grid for UI components. The site includes a cookie consent mechanism with granular control and CAPTCHA protection on forms, indicating some technical maturity. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with minimal metadata and no structured data (JSON-LD) detected. The site lacks visible security headers and HTTPS verification data, which are critical technical risks. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not available from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cobrasecurity.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cobrasecurity.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.