Skip to main content

Security report for coagency.lt

coagency, UAB · Other · Lithuania

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

co:agency is a well-established communication solutions agency based in Lithuania, founded in 2005. It positions itself as one of the largest communication agencies in the country, offering a broad range of traditional and digital communication services aimed at helping clients achieve their business goals. The website is professionally designed, bilingual (Lithuanian and English), and targets businesses and organizations seeking communication expertise. The agency emphasizes partnership and tailored solutions rather than generic services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and WPML for multilingual support. It uses modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery, Owl Carousel, and WOW.js for interactive and animated content. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are implemented for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, with proper meta tags and structured data. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent banner, indicating GDPR compliance. However, no advanced security headers were detected, and there is no visible security policy or incident response information. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, which limits domain trust verification. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy image with good content quality and technical implementation. Strategic improvements in security headers, explicit security policies, and WHOIS transparency would further enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching coagency.lt

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention coagency.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for coagency.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency operates in the communication and marketing sector, serving a medium-sized business model focused on delivering tailored communication solutions. Its market position as one of Lithuania's largest agencies is supported by a diverse client portfolio including notable brands. The business model relies on a mix of traditional and digital communication services, emphasizing measurable and rational communication strategies. The company targets corporate clients and organizations seeking to enhance reputation, internal communication, crisis management, and social campaigns. Growth indicators include a multilingual website, active social media presence, and a broad service offering. Partnerships appear limited to social media platforms, with no detected subsidiaries or parent companies. The agency's operations reflect a mature communication service provider with a focus on client value and long-term partnerships.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place, reflecting GDPR awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security hardening. No visible forms collecting sensitive data reduce immediate risk exposure, but the lack of explicit security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency. The WHOIS data unavailability restricts domain legitimacy verification, though no suspicious content or vulnerabilities were detected. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces moderate tracking but appears compliant with privacy norms. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for the business type but could benefit from enhanced header implementation and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to increase transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
coagency, UAB
VAT number
LT100001552013
Registration number
300078393
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
coagency, UAB
Description
Esame viena didžiausių komunikacijos agentūrų Lietuvoje. Pasitelkdami tradicinius ir skaitmeninius sprendimus, padedame klientams siekti verslo tikslų.
Key services
Reputacijos kūrimas, Paslaugų/produktų komunikacija, Darbdavio įvaizdžio stiprinimas, Vidinė komunikacija, Ryšiai su interesų grupėmis, Socialinė atsakomybė, Krizių prevencija ir valdymas, Skaitmeninė komunikacija, Nuostatų ir elgsenos keitimo kampanijos, Socialinės kampanijos
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Owl Carousel, WOW.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Yoast SEO, WPML
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Lithuanian language
  2. Professional communication agency with clear business focus
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy present indicating GDPR awareness
  4. No visible forms collecting personal data on main page
  5. Social media links to Facebook and LinkedIn are present and appear legitimate
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages found
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit, limiting domain trust verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Owl Carousel, WOW.js, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is multilingual using WPML and optimized for SEO with Yoast SEO plugin. Performance is moderate with standard optimization practices. Mobile responsiveness is good, and navigation is clear and user-friendly. The site uses HTTPS exclusively, ensuring encrypted communication. No advanced hosting or CDN information was detected. The technical implementation is solid but could be improved by adding security headers and enhancing accessibility compliance. The site does not expose sensitive data and uses cookie consent to comply with privacy regulations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with coagency.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review coagency.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.