Skip to main content

Security report for cnil.fr

Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés · Government · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The CNIL website represents the official French national data protection authority, providing comprehensive information, guidance, and regulatory enforcement related to data privacy. It serves a broad audience including individuals, professionals, and the press, positioning itself as a key government regulator in the data protection sector. The website is well-maintained with a consistent brand identity and high-quality content that supports its mission effectively. Technically, the site is built on a modern Drupal CMS platform with Bootstrap for responsive design, enhanced by privacy-respecting analytics (Matomo) and a robust cookie consent mechanism (tarteaucitron.js). Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, though accessibility could be improved further. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and includes standard security headers. It avoids exposing sensitive data and uses privacy-conscious analytics. However, explicit security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly available, representing areas for improvement. Overall, the CNIL website demonstrates a strong security posture, excellent privacy compliance, and high business credibility as a government entity. It is a trustworthy source of information on data protection in France, with minimal risk factors identified.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Twitter, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cnil.fr

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
70
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CNIL holds a dominant position as the French data protection authority, mandated to inform, protect, and regulate data privacy. Its business model is regulatory and educational rather than commercial, funded by the government. The website supports its mission by providing extensive resources, complaint mechanisms, and public awareness campaigns. Partnerships with research institutions like Inria indicate active engagement in innovation and algorithm evaluation. The target audience spans individuals, professionals, and media, reflecting a broad mandate. The domain's longevity and official .fr TLD reinforce its legitimacy and authority in the market. The site’s ecosystem includes social media presence on Twitter and LinkedIn, enhancing outreach. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a controlled communication channel via web forms, typical for government entities. CNIL’s strategic focus on GDPR compliance and digital ethics positions it as a leader in European data protection governance.

Security posture

The CNIL website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, strong SSL/TLS configuration, and comprehensive security headers. The use of Cloudflare provides additional protection and performance benefits. Privacy is prioritized through the use of Matomo analytics configured to avoid cookie deposition and a transparent cookie consent manager. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a publicly accessible security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and may hinder external security collaboration. Publishing these documents and contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails) would enhance trust and preparedness. Accessibility compliance is basic and could be improved to meet higher standards. Overall, the site is secure and privacy-conscious but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security governance disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, including security contact emails.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG 2.1 AA or higher standards.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Maintain transparency on data retention policies related to analytics and user data.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés
Description
French national data protection authority providing information, guidance, and enforcement on data privacy and protection.
Key services
Information on data rights, Complaint handling, Regulatory enforcement, Public awareness and education
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, Bootstrap CSS framework, jQuery, Matomo analytics, tarteaucitron.js (cookie consent manager)
Frameworks
Drupal 10.4.6, Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Matomo with no cookies set (privacy respecting analytics)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
excellent

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a French government authority site focused on data protection and privacy.
  2. Content is comprehensive, well-structured, and professionally presented.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie management practices are implemented.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed; contact via forms.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response page found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10.4.6, leveraging Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It uses Matomo for privacy-friendly analytics and tarteaucitron.js for cookie consent management, reflecting a modern and privacy-aware tech stack. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare, providing DNS and CDN services that improve security and performance. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, likely due to rich content and carousel features. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement. The technical infrastructure is robust and aligns well with the site's government regulatory function, though ongoing maintenance and modernization are recommended to sustain security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100Low26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cnil.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cnil.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.