Skip to main content

Security report for cncbaltic.lv

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

68/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website cncbaltic.lv currently serves as a security challenge page implemented by BitNinja, requiring visitors to complete a CAPTCHA to proceed. This indicates the site is protected against automated bots and potential malicious traffic. No business or contact information is publicly accessible on this page, and the content is minimal, serving only as a gatekeeper rather than a full website. The presence of outdated CMS references (Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5) suggests the underlying platform may be legacy and potentially vulnerable if not updated. Technically, the site uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking, and Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation. However, no security headers or HTTPS enforcement details are visible, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating poor privacy compliance. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, preventing domain legitimacy verification. Security posture is limited to the CAPTCHA protection, but the lack of visible security headers and outdated CMS versions pose risks. The site is effectively blocked for analysis by the security challenge, resulting in a low overall trust and quality score. Strategic recommendations include upgrading CMS software, implementing HTTPS and security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear business and contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cncbaltic.lv

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
68

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the website being a security challenge page, no direct business information or market positioning can be determined. The domain appears to be protected by BitNinja, a security service, which may indicate prior abuse or automated traffic issues. No company name, services, or sector information is available. The lack of contact details and policies suggests limited transparency and business credibility. The use of multiple CMS references may indicate a legacy or multi-platform environment, but no clear business model or revenue streams are identifiable from the content.

Security posture

The website employs BitNinja's security challenge with Google reCAPTCHA v2 to mitigate automated bot traffic, which is a positive security control. However, the absence of HTTPS enforcement details, missing security headers (such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security), and outdated CMS versions represent significant security weaknesses. No incident response or security policy information is provided. Privacy compliance is poor, with no visible privacy or cookie policies. The overall security maturity is low, with critical improvements needed to reduce risk and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a strong TLS configuration to secure all traffic.
  2. Upgrade Joomla and WordPress CMS installations to supported, secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  5. Provide clear business contact information and security incident response contacts to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

BitNinja detected. The website content is a security challenge page by BitNinja, blocking access until CAPTCHA is solved. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5, Drupal, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA v2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently blocked by a BitNinja anti-robot CAPTCHA challenge.
  2. No business or contact information is publicly available on the page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. CMS versions indicated are outdated and potentially vulnerable.
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates tracking but no privacy compliance.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement details visible.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded error.
  8. Website content is minimal and serves only as a security gate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy CMS platforms (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) alongside Drupal references, indicating a potentially outdated and fragmented technology stack. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for user tracking, and Google reCAPTCHA v2 is used for bot mitigation. The site lacks modern security headers and does not display HTTPS enforcement information. The page is minimal and serves as a security gate rather than a full content site. Performance is moderate but limited by the security challenge. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced features detected. SEO optimization is poor due to minimal content and lack of metadata beyond basic keywords and description.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cncbaltic.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cncbaltic.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.