Skip to main content

Security report for cmeleon.nl

INOVA · Other · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INOVA is a full-service marketing communication agency based in the Netherlands, established in 2005. The company focuses on building the future of organizations through marketing and data-driven strategies, offering services across marcom, data, creativity, development, and online domains. Their market position is that of an established, data-supported marketing bureau targeting organizations seeking integrated marketing solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with excellent content quality and user experience. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA, and various JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js and GSAP. It is built on the proprietary INOVA CMeleon5 CMS platform. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced, CSRF tokens are present, and cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls. However, explicit security headers and published security policies are absent. The security posture is solid but could be improved by adding security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and implementing a vulnerability disclosure policy. Privacy compliance is good, with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Contact information is comprehensive and prominently displayed, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professionally maintained, and compliant with privacy standards. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and improving accessibility features to further strengthen the security and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cmeleon.nl

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INOVA operates in the marketing communication sector with a focus on data-driven solutions. Their business model is full-service, integrating marketing, communication, data analytics, creative services, development, and online marketing. The company targets organizations looking for future-proof marketing strategies. Their competitive advantage lies in combining creativity with data insights. The company has a medium size and a stable market presence since 2005. Partnerships include a dedicated support subdomain. Revenue streams likely include project-based marketing services and ongoing client support. The company maintains active social media channels to engage with clients and prospects. Strategic observations suggest a mature operation with opportunities to enhance security transparency and accessibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protection in place. Cookie consent is implemented with user choice, and Google reCAPTCHA is used to protect forms. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No incident response or security policy is published, which limits transparency and readiness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved by formalizing policies and enhancing HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
INOVA
Registration number
KvK 12050865
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
INOVA
Description
Wij bouwen aan de toekomst van organisaties middels marketing en data. Gedreven vanuit een ontwikkelende marktvraag en digitalisering. Gestaafd door data.
Key services
marketing, communication, data, creatie, development, online
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA, Swiper.js, GSAP TweenMax, Vimeo Player API, Lightbox2, Animate.css, INOVA CMeleon5 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • CSRF token present in meta tags
  • Cookie consent with granular options
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong cookie consent mechanism with granular user control
  3. No explicit terms of service found
  4. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and CMS
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram
  8. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a proprietary CMS (INOVA CMeleon5) and uses modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for sliders, GSAP for animations, and Lightbox2 for image display. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for tracking and analytics. The site uses Vimeo for video embedding and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Technical risks include the lack of some security headers and potential technical debt from custom CMS reliance. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security headers to enhance robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cmeleon.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cmeleon.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.