Skip to main content

Security report for club-asteria.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website club-asteria.com is a parked domain primarily monetized through advertising networks such as Sedo, ParkLogic, and Google Ads. It does not represent an active business entity and lacks any substantive content beyond generic information and ad placements. The site targets Finnish-speaking users seeking general information but offers no direct services or products. The technical infrastructure relies on standard HTML5, CSS normalization, and third-party ad scripts, hosted via domain parking providers. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with limited SEO optimization. Security posture is weak, with no visible HTTPS enforcement or security headers, and no privacy or security policies beyond a generic Sedo privacy policy. No contact or business identity information is provided, reducing trustworthiness and business credibility. Overall, the site functions as a monetized placeholder rather than a legitimate business website.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching club-asteria.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention club-asteria.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
529
Employees
0
Customers
529
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
34%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for club-asteria.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain is registered with Epik LLC since 2016 and is consistent with a domain parking strategy rather than an operational business. There are no indications of a company or organizational presence, no contact details, and no business model beyond ad revenue. The target audience is broad and undefined, primarily internet users searching for information. The lack of business information, certifications, or partnerships indicates minimal market presence or competitive advantage. The site’s revenue likely derives from pay-per-click advertising through Sedo and Google networks. There is no evidence of growth initiatives or strategic partnerships beyond domain parking services.

Security posture

Security maturity is low. The absence of HTTPS enforcement and security headers exposes users to potential risks. No incident response or security policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. Tracking pixels from Google and Facebook are used, but privacy compliance is minimal. The site does implement a cookie consent banner, but the privacy policy is generic and not tailored to the site’s operations. The domain lacks DNSSEC, which could improve DNS security. Overall, the security posture is insufficient for a business website but typical for a parked domain.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear privacy, security, and terms of service policies tailored to the site’s operations.
  4. Add verifiable business contact information to improve trust and credibility.
  5. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security and prevent spoofing.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
club-asteria.com on ensimmäinen ja paras lähde kaikelle hakemallesi tiedolle. Yleisistä ja yksityiskohtaisista aiheista, enemmän kuin osaat odottaa, club-asteria.com-sivulta löydät kaiken. Toivottavasti löydät hakemasi!
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS Normalize, Google Ads CAF (Custom Ad Formats), Sedo Domain Parking scripts, ParkLogic domain parking script
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Sedo Domain Parking Ads, ParkLogic
Tracking pixels
Google Ads tracking pixels, Facebook Pixel (detected via cookie check script)
Marketing tools
Google Ads, Sedo Parking scripts
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a domain parking page with no active business content.
  2. No contact information or business identity is provided.
  3. Privacy policy is a generic Sedo parking policy in Finnish.
  4. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  5. No terms of service or security policies found.
  6. No forms or data collection fields detected except search box for parked domain ads.
  7. Multiple external ad and tracking scripts from Sedo, ParkLogic, and Google.
  8. No HTTPS enforcement or security headers visible in provided data.
  9. No social media or company contact emails or phone numbers found.
  10. WHOIS data shows domain registered with Epik LLC since 2016, expires in 2025.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML5 and CSS with normalization for cross-browser consistency. It integrates multiple third-party scripts for advertising and tracking, including Google Ads CAF, Sedo parking scripts, and ParkLogic enhancements. The site lacks a CMS or modern web frameworks and shows minimal mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, likely impacted by multiple ad scripts and iframes. SEO is poor due to lack of meta tags beyond basic description and no structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. The hosting is via domain parking providers, indicating no dedicated infrastructure or content management. Technical debt is low but reflects minimal investment in site development or user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with club-asteria.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review club-asteria.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.