Skip to main content

Security report for clpsafety.co.uk

CLP Safety & Training Ltd · Other · United Kingdom

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CLP Safety & Training Ltd is a UK-based health and safety consultancy firm established since 1995, specializing in supporting SMEs across diverse industries such as construction, retail, leisure, and engineering. The company offers tailored consultancy services including regulatory compliance, SSIP accreditation support, and assistance with Pre-Qualification Questionnaires, positioning itself as an experienced and trusted partner with long-term client relationships. The website reflects a professional business model focused on consultancy and training services for small and medium enterprises. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.7 using the Flatsome theme and Contact Form 7 plugin, with Google Fonts integration. The site is hosted likely by 20i Ltd, a UK-based hosting and registrar provider. The website demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. No advanced analytics or tracking tools are detected, indicating a minimal user tracking approach. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and standard WordPress security practices but lacks visible security headers and formal security or incident response policies. There are no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Contact information is clearly provided, but no dedicated security contact channels or certifications are presented. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and credible with a moderate security posture and some compliance shortcomings. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and incident response documentation would enhance trust and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clpsafety.co.uk

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CLP Safety & Training Ltd operates in a niche consultancy market focusing on health and safety compliance for SMEs in the UK. Their competitive advantage lies in long-standing client relationships and expertise across multiple sectors including construction and retail. The business model is service-oriented, generating revenue through consultancy and training engagements. The target customer segment is small and medium enterprises requiring tailored health and safety solutions. Growth indicators include over two decades of operation and sustained client retention. The company does not publicly disclose partnerships or subsidiaries on the website. The digital presence is professional but lacks advanced marketing or analytics integrations, suggesting a focus on direct client engagement rather than broad digital marketing. Strategic observations include the need to enhance digital compliance and security transparency to align with evolving regulatory expectations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security maturity with HTTPS enforced and use of reputable WordPress plugins. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, limiting readiness for security events. Data protection practices are minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which may expose the business to GDPR compliance risks. The contact form is implemented via Contact Form 7, a widely used plugin, but no explicit anti-spam or input validation details are evident. Overall, the security culture appears basic, with room for improvement in formalizing policies and technical controls to protect client data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve technical security posture.
  3. Develop and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Introduce cookie consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CLP Safety & Training Ltd
Description
Health & Safety Consultancy supporting SMEs since 1995 with tailored solutions ensuring Health & Safety compliance, confidence, and peace of mind. They work across diverse industries including retail, leisure, engineering, and construction, providing expert consultancy, regulatory issue resolution, SSIP accreditation support, and Pre-Qualification Questionnaire completion.
Key services
Health & Safety Consultancy, Regulatory compliance support, SSIP accreditation assistance, Pre-Qualification Questionnaire completion
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7, PHP, jQuery (commented out but referenced), Google Web Fonts, Contact Form 7 plugin, Flatsome theme
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URLs and resource loading over HTTPS)
  • Use of Contact Form 7 with spam protection scripts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, and contact form.
  4. No social media links or security incident contact channels detected.
  5. Technical stack is standard WordPress with common plugins and Google Fonts.
  6. No analytics or advertising/tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  7. Security headers are not detected in the HTML content; potential area for improvement.
  8. Content is professional and relevant to health and safety consultancy for SMEs.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using version 6.7, with the Flatsome theme and Contact Form 7 plugin for form handling. Google Web Fonts are used for typography, and jQuery is referenced though commented out. The site loads resources over HTTPS, indicating good SSL configuration. Performance is moderate with caching and minified CSS/JS assets present. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic, with skip links and semantic HTML present but no advanced ARIA roles detected. SEO optimization is basic, with meta viewport and canonical tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags found. The technical stack is standard for small business websites but could benefit from enhanced security headers and SEO structured data for improved performance and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clpsafety.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clpsafety.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.