Skip to main content

Security report for cloudcomputing-insider.de

CloudComputing-Insider · Technology · Germany

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CloudComputing-Insider is a German-language specialist media portal focused on cloud computing and software as a service. It provides news, whitepapers, webinars, podcasts, and IT awards content targeting IT professionals and business decision makers interested in cloud technologies. The site is professionally designed with consistent branding and good navigation, supported by a modern technical stack including Google Tag Manager and a consent management platform for GDPR compliance. Hosting is likely provided by Deutsche Telekom, consistent with the domain's WHOIS data. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and consent management in place, but lacks explicit privacy policy, terms of service, and security headers. No direct contact information or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the site is a credible and professional media portal with moderate to good technical and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 16 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cloudcomputing-insider.de

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cloudcomputing-insider.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
67
Employees
0
Customers
67
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
13%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for cloudcomputing-insider.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The portal operates as a media and information platform within the technology sector, specifically cloud computing. Its business model is advertising-driven, leveraging Google ad networks and consent management to monetize content. The target audience includes IT professionals and enterprises interested in cloud services. The site is part of the Vogel media group ecosystem, indicated by related domains and hosting infrastructure. The content strategy includes specialized IT awards, whitepapers, and webinars, positioning it as a thought leader in the German cloud computing market. The lack of explicit company contact details and privacy policies suggests room for improvement in transparency and user trust. The partnership with Vogel IT Akademie indicates a broader educational and professional development ecosystem.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a consent management platform to comply with GDPR cookie regulations, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks a published security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for mature security governance. The use of third-party scripts, including Google Ads and consent manager, introduces typical third-party risks but appears managed via consent. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by adding security headers, publishing policies, and providing security contact information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  4. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CloudComputing-Insider
Description
Fachportal providing news, articles, and resources about cloud computing and software as a service.
Key services
News articles, Whitepapers, Webinars, Podcasts, IT Awards, Specials and reports
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Publisher Tags (GPT), Consentmanager.net CMP, SCSS/CSS, Lazy loading images, JSON-LD structured data
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Google Ads, Consentmanager tracking
Marketing tools
Consentmanager CMP
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a German-language professional cloud computing media portal.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content.
  3. Comprehensive consent management implemented for GDPR compliance.
  4. No direct contact information (email, phone, address) found in HTML content.
  5. Advertising and tracking scripts are primarily Google-based with consent management.
  6. Website uses modern web technologies and lazy loading for performance.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. WHOIS data aligns with hosting and domain usage; no suspicious indicators.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Google Publisher Tags for advertising. It employs lazy loading for images and uses SCSS-based CSS for styling. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including JSON-LD structured data. Hosting is likely with Deutsche Telekom, supported by DNS nameservers. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and preconnect hints to CDNs. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cloudcomputing-insider.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cloudcomputing-insider.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.