Skip to main content

Security report for clipara.com

Atom · E-commerce · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Atom operates a professional domain marketplace platform specializing in premium and curated domain name sales. The website Clipara.com is presented as a premium domain for sale, targeting startups and businesses seeking brandable domain assets. The platform offers additional branding services such as free logos to enhance buyer appeal. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap for responsive design, New Relic for performance monitoring, and Intercom for customer support chat. The site is well-optimized for mobile and desktop users with good performance and user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and monitoring scripts in place, though explicit security headers and policies are not fully visible. Privacy and cookie policies are not clearly presented, indicating room for compliance improvement. WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which limits full legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is professional and functional with moderate risk due to missing WHOIS and privacy documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clipara.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
98
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Atom positions itself as a curated domain marketplace with a focus on premium and brandable domains, serving entrepreneurs and startups. The business model is e-commerce based, generating revenue from domain sales and possibly related branding services. The platform leverages partnerships such as Trustpilot for reputation and Intercom for customer engagement. Market positioning is solid within the domain sales niche, with a medium-sized operational scale. The company maintains multiple contact channels including phone, email, and live chat, enhancing customer trust. The lack of detailed WHOIS data and privacy documentation suggests potential gaps in transparency and compliance that could impact customer confidence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with enforced HTTPS and use of security monitoring tools like New Relic. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident in the provided data. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a visible security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure page indicates limited transparency in security governance. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could pose regulatory risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with opportunities for improvement in policy visibility and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Implement and expose security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add a security.txt file or dedicated vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Improve accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and enhance user inclusivity.
  5. Enhance SEO metadata and structured data to improve search engine visibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Atom
Description
Atom operates a domain marketplace platform offering premium and curated domain names for sale, targeting startups and businesses seeking brandable domains. The site promotes domain sales with additional branding assets such as free logos.
Key services
Domain name sales, Premium domain marketplace, Branding assets (free logos)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
New Relic Browser monitoring, Intercom chat widget, Bootstrap CSS framework, Google Tag Manager, Web fonts (Product Sans, Plus Jakarta Sans)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security monitoring scripts (New Relic)

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic
Marketing tools
Intercom
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a domain marketplace page for Clipara.com domain sale
  2. No WHOIS data available for domain domains.atom.com or Clipara.com
  3. Site uses HTTPS and modern web technologies
  4. Contact information is present with phone, email, and chat support
  5. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the HTML content
  6. No visible security or incident response policies
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  8. Site content is safe and business-focused
  9. New Relic and Google Tag Manager used for analytics and monitoring
  10. Intercom used for live chat support
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, New Relic for real-time performance monitoring, and Intercom for customer support. The site loads quickly and is optimized for mobile devices. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tag management. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform. The technical implementation is robust with good performance metrics, though accessibility and SEO could be further enhanced. No outdated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the scripts. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable e-commerce domain marketplace.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clipara.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clipara.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.