Skip to main content

Security report for clima.com

Other · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.clima.com is a Spanish-language weather forecast platform focused on providing meteorological information for America. It offers updated weather forecasts and related climate data, targeting a general audience interested in weather conditions. The site integrates modern analytics and consent management tools, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and consent mechanisms in place, but the lack of security headers and explicit privacy policies suggests room for improvement. Overall, the site appears functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced compliance and transparency measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clima.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the weather information sector, likely monetizing through advertising and providing meteorological data services. It appears to be part of a network of related weather sites in various languages, suggesting a broader partnership ecosystem. The business model focuses on content delivery rather than direct sales. The lack of explicit company information and contact details limits assessment of market positioning and growth indicators. The site targets Spanish-speaking users interested in weather forecasts across America, positioning itself as a regional weather information provider.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates a consent management platform (Didomi), reflecting awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The absence of a published privacy policy and terms of service reduces compliance transparency. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available, which could hinder effective security incident management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting standard security headers, publishing compliance documents, and providing clear security contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security inquiries.
  4. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and ensure compliance with relevant privacy regulations such as GDPR.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
En Clima podrás encontrar el pronóstico del tiempo para América. Además encontrarás información actualizada para los próximos días.
Key services
weather forecasts for America, updated meteorological information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Didomi Consent Management, Hotjar, Swiper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Didomi Consent SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is primarily weather forecasts for America in Spanish language.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the HTML content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Didomi SDK.
  5. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found on the main page.
  6. Multiple external links to related weather sites in different languages detected.
  7. Uses modern tracking and analytics tools including Google Analytics and Hotjar.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for an active commercial website.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking, and Didomi for consent management. The site is served over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. The front-end uses Swiper.js for UI components and loads CSS and JS assets from a CDN, indicating a distributed hosting approach. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present. However, no CMS or backend platform was explicitly detected. The site lacks some technical security best practices such as security headers and explicit privacy/legal pages, which are important for compliance and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clima.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clima.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.