Click Guardian is a UK-based SaaS company specializing in click fraud detection and protection for PPC advertising campaigns on Google Ads and Bing Ads. Positioned as a market leader in the UK, the company offers automated real-time monitoring and blocking of fraudulent clicks, targeting businesses seeking to protect their advertising budgets from competitors, bots, and malicious actors. Their service includes advanced features such as device fingerprinting, VPN/TOR/proxy detection, and multi-device support, delivered through a subscription model with tiered pricing and a free trial.
Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including Alpine.js, Statamic CMS, and is hosted on AWS infrastructure with DNS managed by Amazon Route 53. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Matomo, Facebook Pixel, and Crisp Chat for user engagement and tracking. The site is mobile optimized, fast loading, and SEO friendly, reflecting a mature digital presence.
From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs Cloudflare Turnstile CAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. However, it lacks some advanced security headers and does not publish explicit security or incident response policies. The domain registration is privacy protected, which is common but slightly reduces transparency. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected.
Overall, Click Guardian presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with a solid technical foundation and good security posture. Areas for improvement include implementing a cookie consent mechanism to enhance privacy compliance and publishing detailed security and incident response policies to build further trust with customers.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
61
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention clickguardian.ai, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for clickguardian.ai right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Click Guardian operates in the niche market of click fraud protection for PPC advertisers, primarily targeting small to medium businesses using Google and Bing Ads. Their competitive advantage lies in automated real-time blocking and comprehensive detection features including VPN and proxy identification. The subscription pricing model with multiple tiers caters to different business sizes and needs, including agency partnerships with dedicated account management. The company benefits from a strong UK market presence and positive customer ratings. Strategic partnerships with Further Forward Innovation Ltd. and use of a dedicated SaaS platform (v2.clickfraud.app) support scalability and customer engagement. Growth opportunities include expanding international reach and enhancing privacy compliance to meet evolving regulations.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, use of CAPTCHA to prevent automated abuse, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The absence of DNSSEC and some recommended security headers indicates room for improvement. Lack of published security policies and incident response contacts suggests limited transparency in security governance. The use of privacy-protected WHOIS is standard but reduces domain trust slightly. Overall, the security posture is solid for a SaaS provider but could be enhanced by adopting industry best practices such as ISO 27001 or NIST frameworks and publishing relevant policies.
Recommendations
Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
Consider obtaining recognized security certifications (e.g., ISO 27001) to strengthen trust and compliance.
JavaScript, Cloudflare Turnstile CAPTCHA, Matomo Analytics, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Crisp Chat
Frameworks
Alpine.js (x-data directives), Statamic CMS (implied by antlers.html snippets)
Platforms
AWS (DNS via awsdns name servers)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Use of Cloudflare Turnstile CAPTCHA
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
No vulnerable libraries detected
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics, Matomo Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Crisp Chat
Transparency
good
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
Content is professionally presented and relevant to click fraud protection.
No explicit cookie consent mechanism found despite use of tracking scripts.
Contact information is clear but phone number is missing or not clearly labeled.
Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present and linked in footer.
Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates moderate user tracking.
No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Domain uses privacy protection which is common but reduces transparency.
Website uses modern technologies and is mobile optimized.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on a modern technology stack including Alpine.js for interactivity and Statamic CMS for content management, hosted on AWS infrastructure with Amazon Route 53 DNS. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, including Google Analytics, Matomo, Facebook Pixel, and Crisp Chat, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. Performance is optimized with preloading and module preloading of assets, and the site is fully responsive with good accessibility features. The use of Cloudflare Turnstile CAPTCHA adds a layer of bot protection. Technical risks are minimal, but the absence of DNSSEC and some security headers represent potential areas for technical debt and security enhancement.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with clickguardian.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clickguardian.ai.