Skip to main content

Security report for clearjunction.com

Clear Junction · Finance · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Clear Junction is a global payments provider specializing in connecting financial institutions to payment rails and treasury services. Founded in 2016, the company operates a professional WordPress-based website that targets financial institutions and payment service providers. The site demonstrates moderate digital maturity with a modern tech stack including Google Analytics, HubSpot, and LinkedIn tracking, and is hosted with infrastructure linked to Amazon Registrar, Inc. The website content is relevant and professionally presented, though explicit privacy and cookie policies are not found in the provided data. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied and domain registration locks in place, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security policies. Overall, the domain registration and business information are consistent and legitimate, supporting a medium-sized finance sector business.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of clearjunction.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clearjunction.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
60
Email security
72
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention clearjunction.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
34
Employees
0
Customers
32
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
9%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for clearjunction.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Clear Junction positions itself as a key player in the global payments infrastructure market, offering connectivity and treasury services to financial institutions. The business model is B2B, focusing on payment rails integration and treasury management. The company leverages partnerships and digital marketing tools such as HubSpot and LinkedIn for lead generation and brand awareness. The domain age and registration details align with the company's founding date, indicating stable operations. However, the absence of visible certifications or trust badges on the site suggests opportunities to enhance credibility. The target audience is primarily financial institutions seeking payment processing solutions.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and domain status locks to protect domain integrity. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No explicit security headers or policies were detected in the provided content, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces moderate user tracking, but no vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were identified. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR requirements. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing DNSSEC, security headers, and publishing comprehensive security and privacy policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  3. Implement and disclose a formal security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve browser security.
  5. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce user tracking and enhance privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Clear Junction
Description
Clear Junction is a global payments provider. We power financial institutions by connecting them to payment rails and treasury services.
Key services
payment rails connectivity, treasury services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot Analytics, Rank Math SEO
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled (implied by canonical URL https://clearjunction.com/)
  • Use of security status domain statuses: clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based corporate site for a financial services company
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content
  3. Multiple forms present but no detailed form field data extracted due to content truncation
  4. Use of multiple marketing and analytics scripts indicating moderate user tracking
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies disclosed
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content
  7. No security headers information available from provided data
  8. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress and uses modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery 3.7.1. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. Hosting appears to be supported by Amazon Registrar, Inc., suggesting AWS infrastructure. The site includes SEO optimizations via Rank Math plugin and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading. Mobile optimization is good, and accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are technical risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but has room for security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 89/100Low13 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clearjunction.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clearjunction.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.