Skip to main content

Security report for cleanwhale.lv

CleanWhale · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CleanWhale is a professional cleaning service company operating primarily in Latvia with a presence in multiple countries including Poland, Germany, Ukraine, Belarus, Czech Republic, Slovakia, and the USA. Founded in 2016, the company offers a wide range of cleaning services including apartment cleaning, post-renovation cleaning, window washing, chemical cleaning of furniture, office cleaning, and private house cleaning. The business model includes online ordering, subscription services, and additional specialized cleaning options. The website is well-branded, content-rich, and targets both residential and commercial customers, positioning itself as a reliable and professional cleaning service provider in the regional market. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Dinero.js, LazyLoad, and Swiper.js, along with tracking and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Yandex Metrika. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and a clear navigation structure. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and accessibility features. The site uses HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration, and privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, but the professional presentation and business information support a positive trust assessment. Overall, CleanWhale presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and accessibility would further enhance the security posture and compliance. The company’s multi-country presence and extensive service offerings indicate a well-established regional player in the cleaning services industry.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cleanwhale.lv

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CleanWhale operates a multi-national cleaning service business with a focus on residential and commercial clients. Its competitive advantage lies in a broad service portfolio, including specialized cleaning services and subscription models, supported by a user-friendly online platform. The company leverages partnerships and sister sites across Europe and the USA to expand market reach. Revenue streams likely include one-time cleaning orders, recurring subscriptions, and additional paid services. The target customer segments include apartment owners, homeowners, businesses, and offices. Growth indicators include a large volume of customer reviews and a wide partner ecosystem. The company maintains a professional brand image with consistent messaging and strong trust signals such as customer testimonials and partner logos. Operationally, the company emphasizes quality, professionalism, and convenience, which supports customer retention and market differentiation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented with strong SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies indicate awareness of data protection regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR appears adequate based on privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing incident response details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and libraries to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider establishing a formal vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA IT klīnings
Registration number
50203411451
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CleanWhale
Description
Dzīvokļu, māju, biroju un jebkuru telpu uzkopšanas pakalpojumi. Regulārās uzkopšanas , ģenerālās uzkopšanas un atsevišķi uzkopšanas pakalpojumi . Rīga, Jūrmala un priekšpilsētas. Septiņas dienas nedēļā.
Key services
Dzīvokļa uzkopšana, Ģenerāltīrīšana, Logu mazgāšana, Ķīmiskā tīrīšana, Biroju uzkopšana, Virtuves uzkopšana, Privātmāju un kotedžu uzkopšana
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Dinero.js, LazyLoad, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
Google Analytics (implied via GTM), Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple language options.
  2. Strong presence in multiple countries with localized domains.
  3. Comprehensive service offerings with detailed descriptions and pricing.
  4. Good privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. Multiple customer reviews and partner logos enhance trust.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools.
  7. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern JavaScript-based front-end with libraries such as jQuery, Dinero.js for pricing calculations, LazyLoad for image optimization, and Swiper.js for interactive sliders. It integrates analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Yandex Metrika for user tracking and conversion measurement. The site is mobile responsive with a clean and professional design, supporting multiple languages and localized content for various countries. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD markup including product and review schemas. The site does not appear to use a common CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust and user-friendly experience but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cleanwhale.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cleanwhale.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.