Skip to main content

Security report for cleanr.lv

Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CleanR is a Latvian business website focused on industry-related services, as indicated by the website title 'CleanR | Industry | Verso'. The site is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The presence of Cookiebot for cookie consent and Google Tag Manager for analytics shows awareness of privacy and marketing needs. However, the lack of visible privacy policy, terms of service, and contact information limits the site's compliance and user trust. The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare DNS, which provides some security and performance benefits. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no advanced security headers detected. The site uses multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools, including Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Meta Platforms, which implies extensive user tracking. Overall, the website is functional and moderately professional but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of cleanr.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cleanr.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website appears to serve a niche industry audience in Latvia, possibly related to cleaning or industrial services, though explicit business descriptions are missing. The business model seems to rely on online presence for marketing and customer engagement rather than direct e-commerce. The use of multiple analytics and marketing platforms suggests a focus on digital marketing and customer insights. No direct contact or company registration information is provided, which limits the ability to assess market positioning or growth indicators. The domain uses Cloudflare DNS, which is common for performance and security. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site lacks published incident response or security policies, which is a compliance gap. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for user trust and compliance.
  3. Implement and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  4. Conduct a security audit of all third-party scripts and plugins to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL and external scripts)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Meta Platforms (Facebook)
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin
  2. Cookiebot is used for GDPR cookie consent management
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content
  5. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts present
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected
  7. Website content is primarily in Latvian with English alternate
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
  9. Domain uses Cloudflare nameservers
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Yoast SEO, indicating a standard CMS-based infrastructure. It uses Cloudflare for DNS, which may provide CDN and security benefits. The site loads multiple external scripts including Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Hotjar, and Mapbox, which may impact performance but provide rich analytics and marketing capabilities. The site appears mobile optimized with responsive design. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple external resources. There is room for modernization by reducing third-party dependencies and improving security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cleanr.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cleanr.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.