Skip to main content

Security report for cleanmann.lv

SIA IKARS S · Other · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cleanmann.lv is a Latvian-based small business specializing in premium quality chemical cleaning services for soft furniture, mattresses, carpets, and other soft floor coverings. Operating primarily in Riga, Pierīgas novados, and Jūrmala, the company offers 24/7 service with free on-site visits and a 9-year track record. Their key services include deep cleaning, odor removal via ozonation, and disinfection, targeting both private and commercial clients. The website is built using Adobe Muse, featuring multiple contact forms and integration with popular analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, and Facebook SDK. While the site demonstrates good content quality and user experience, technical infrastructure relies on somewhat outdated libraries and lacks visible advanced security headers. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic, with no explicit GDPR compliance or incident response information. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the site reflects a legitimate, small-scale service provider with moderate digital maturity and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cleanmann.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a premium cleaning service provider with competitive pricing and a strong focus on customer satisfaction, evidenced by testimonials and Google My Business references. Their business model centers on direct service delivery with flexible scheduling and transparent pricing. The presence of discounts for repeat customers and families indicates customer retention strategies. The use of multiple marketing and tracking tools suggests active digital marketing efforts. However, the lack of detailed corporate information and certifications limits visibility into broader business scale or partnerships. The company appears focused on local market penetration within Latvia, particularly Riga and surrounding areas.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and some anti-bot measures via PPC Protect, but lacks critical HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.8.3) introduces potential vulnerabilities. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. Privacy practices are minimal, with a basic privacy policy and cookie consent banner but no detailed GDPR compliance statements. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by updating libraries, implementing security headers, and publishing clear security and privacy policies.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Enhance privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data retention practices.
  4. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA IKARS S
Registration number
50103043531
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA IKARS S
Description
Izbraukuma ķīmiskā tīrīšana mīkstajām mēbelēm, matračiem, paklājiem un citiem mīkstajiem grīdas segumiem Rīgā, Pierīgas novados un Jūrmalā. PREMIUM kvalitāte ar 9 gadu pieredzi, 24/7 pieejamība, bezmaksas izbraukšana un smaku likvidēšana ar ozonēšanu.
Key services
Mīksto mēbeļu ķīmiskā tīrīšana, Matraču tīrīšana, Paklāju tīrīšana, Smaku likvidēšana (ozonēšana), Dezinfekcija, Telpu uzkopšana
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8.3, Adobe Muse, Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Facebook SDK, PPC Protect, JivoSite chat widget, RequireJS
Frameworks
Adobe Muse
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Use of PPC Protect anti-bot script
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel (via Facebook SDK)
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, PPC Protect, JivoSite chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small local business site for cleaning services in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian with some Russian language options.
  3. Multiple contact forms with AJAX submission and confirmation modals.
  4. Use of several third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic.
  8. No terms of service or incident response information found.
  9. No certifications or security frameworks mentioned.
  10. Site built with Adobe Muse, indicating a static site with limited backend complexity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with Adobe Muse, a static site generator, resulting in a mostly static HTML/CSS/JS site. The tech stack includes legacy jQuery 1.8.3, RequireJS, and multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts. Performance is moderate with some mobile optimization but limited accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta tags and keywords but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data. The site uses AJAX for form submissions with user feedback modals, indicating some level of interactivity. Technical debt is evident in outdated libraries and lack of modern security practices, presenting modernization opportunities to improve security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cleanmann.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cleanmann.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.