Skip to main content

Security report for cleanit.lv

SIA Cleanit Serviss · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cleanit Serviss is a Latvian-based cleaning service company offering a wide range of cleaning solutions including furniture, mattress, carpet, window, and facade cleaning primarily in Riga and surrounding areas. The company targets both residential and business customers, positioning itself as a local professional service provider with liability insurance coverage to enhance customer trust. The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Yandex Metrika to monitor user engagement and marketing effectiveness. Privacy compliance is addressed with a cookie consent banner and a dedicated privacy policy page. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and form validation but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Overall, the website is professional, user-friendly, and trustworthy, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cleanit.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the cleaning services sector, focusing on local markets in Latvia. Its business model is service-based, relying on direct customer engagement through online forms, social media, and phone contacts. The presence of liability insurance indicates a commitment to customer protection. The website's integration with multiple analytics and marketing tools suggests an active approach to customer acquisition and retention. The partnership with a solar panel cleaning service indicates potential service diversification or collaboration. The company appears to be a small-sized enterprise with consistent branding and good content quality, targeting both private individuals and corporate clients.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements, indicating a baseline level of security and privacy compliance. Form inputs have validation to prevent malformed data submissions. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The use of multiple third-party tracking services increases the attack surface and requires careful management of data privacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve site performance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain compliance and security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Cleanit Serviss
Description
Kompānija Cleanit piedāvā visa veida uzkopšanas pakalpojumu fiziskām un juridiskām personām Rīgā, Rīgas rajonā, Mārupē un Jūrmalā. Piedāvā kvalitatīvu telpu uzkopšanu, mīksto mēbeļu, paklāju un logu mazgāšanas pakalpojumus.
Key services
Telpu uzkopšana, Mīksto mēbeļu tīrīšana, Paklāju tīrīšana, Matraču tīrīšana, Logu mazgāšana, Bruģa tīrīšana, Fasāžu mazgāšana, Grīdu tīrīšana, Bērnu ratiņu un autokrēslu tīrīšana, Saules paneļu mazgāšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, jQuery, Tilda CMS scripts
Platforms
Tilda CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Form input validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Latvian language targeting local customers.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories and user control.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, social media, and contact form.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response information published.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  7. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tracking services including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel.
  8. Liability insurance coverage prominently displayed as a trust indicator.
  9. Website built on Tilda CMS platform with standard scripts and CDN hosting.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content; content safety rating is safe.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Tilda's platform using their CDN and standard JavaScript libraries including jQuery. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Yandex Metrika for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility features such as skip links. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external scripts which may impact load times. The technical implementation is modern but could benefit from improved security headers and optimization of third-party resources. The use of Tilda CMS simplifies content management but may limit advanced customization or security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cleanit.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cleanit.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.