Skip to main content

Security report for clarusrm.lv

Zvērinātu advokātu birojs CLARUS RM · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zvērinātu advokātu birojs CLARUS RM is a well-established Latvian law firm founded in 1991, providing comprehensive legal services to clients in Latvia and the Baltic region. The firm is part of the CLARUS network since 2020, enhancing its regional presence. The website is built on WordPress with a modern framework and includes multilingual support, reflecting a professional digital presence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and anti-CSRF protections, though lacking some advanced security headers and formal privacy disclosures. Contact information is clearly presented, supporting business credibility. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clarusrm.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm targets businesses and individuals requiring legal assistance, offering services such as court representation, contract drafting, and legal consultations in multiple languages. Its integration into the CLARUS Baltic network suggests strategic regional collaboration. The business model is a traditional law firm with a focus on quality and client comfort. The website content and structure support a strong market position as a reputable legal service provider in Latvia. No direct revenue streams or e-commerce features are present, consistent with professional services. The absence of social media links indicates a focus on direct client relationships rather than broad digital marketing.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes anti-CSRF tokens in forms, indicating awareness of basic web security practices. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which is a gap for transparency and trust. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of WordPress and jQuery requires ongoing patching to mitigate common CMS risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional controls and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add an incident response page with contact details for security issues and vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear cookie consent mechanisms.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
“Zvērinātu advokātu birojs CLARUS RM” SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zvērinātu advokātu birojs CLARUS RM
Description
Zvērinātu advokātu birojs CLARUS RM is a Latvian sworn advocate law firm established in 1991 after Latvia regained independence. It is recognized as an experienced and reputable law office serving a broad client base domestically and internationally. Since 2020, it has joined the CLARUS network of law firms in Estonia and Lithuania, providing Baltic-wide legal services. The firm values competence, responsibility, continuous development, and offers thoughtful, creative, and progressive legal solutions. Services include comprehensive legal assistance, court representation, contract drafting, legal opinions, and consultations in multiple languages including Latvian, English, Russian, German, and Spanish.
Key services
Legal assistance and defense in courts, Representation before state and municipal authorities, Pre-trial and out-of-court dispute resolution, Contract and document drafting, Legal opinions and consultations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.9.10, jQuery 3.6.0, Avia Framework, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Avia Framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Form submission includes anti-CSRF hidden fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
WP-Statistics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Latvian with multilingual support.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in footer with email, phone, and physical address.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with Avia Framework and jQuery.
  7. HTTPS is enabled and enforced.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data.
  9. Forms include hidden anti-CSRF tokens.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response info found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress 5.9.10 with the Avia Framework and jQuery 3.6.0, a common and mature CMS stack. Google Fonts are loaded conditionally based on cookie consent. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with some inline scripts and CSS for above-the-fold content. No major technical debt or errors were detected in the HTML. The site lacks advanced SEO structured data or Open Graph tags beyond basic metadata. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clarusrm.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clarusrm.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.