Skip to main content

Security report for cjviry.com

国家公务员考试报名网 · Government · China

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

国家公务员考试报名网 is a specialized Chinese government exam information portal providing comprehensive resources including exam schedules, announcements, position listings, past exam papers, and score queries. The website targets prospective civil servants and exam candidates, offering a centralized platform for exam-related information. The business model is primarily informational, serving as a portal rather than a transactional site, with a focus on government exam preparation and updates. The site is relatively new, founded in 2024, and maintains consistent branding and content quality suitable for its niche audience. Technically, the website employs standard web technologies such as jQuery and custom CSS/JS, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. SEO practices are evident through meta tags and Baidu push scripts, enhancing search engine visibility. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for improved security posture. Hosting details are limited, but the domain registrar is July Name Limited, with no privacy protection, indicating transparency. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protection enabled, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers like CSP or HSTS. No privacy or cookie consent mechanisms are present, which may affect compliance with privacy regulations. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are provided, limiting user support channels. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected, and the site appears safe for general audiences. Overall, the website is a credible and useful resource for its target audience but would benefit from enhanced security measures and improved privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include implementing DNSSEC, adding security headers, deploying cookie consent banners, and providing clearer contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cjviry.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cjviry.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for cjviry.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche market focused on Chinese government civil service exam candidates, providing timely and relevant exam information and resources. Its competitive advantage lies in comprehensive coverage of exam announcements, position listings, and preparation materials. The business model is informational with potential monetization through advertising or partnerships, though no explicit monetization is visible. The target audience is well-defined, consisting of exam candidates and related stakeholders. The site maintains partnerships with regional subdomains and related educational sites, enhancing its ecosystem. Growth indicators include frequent content updates and a broad range of exam-related topics. The site’s operations appear focused on content delivery and user engagement within the government exam preparation sector.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer protection is enabled, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. Privacy compliance is partial, with no cookie consent mechanisms detected. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the analyzed content. To enhance security, the site should implement DNSSEC, add security headers, and improve privacy compliance. Regular security audits and incident response planning are recommended to strengthen resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  4. Publish clear contact information including verified company emails and phone numbers to enhance user support and credibility.
  5. Develop and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
国家公务员考试报名网
Description
国家公务员考试报名网,国家公务员考试官方网站,为考生提供国家公务员考试时间,国家公务员考试报名,国家公务员考试科目,历年公务员考试真题,国家公务员考试职位表,公务员考试成绩查询等服务。
Key services
考试时间发布, 成绩查询, 报名入口, 考试公告, 职位表发布, 考试大纲, 历年真题, 报考指导
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Baidu linksubmit push.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Chinese government exam information portal.
  2. Content is comprehensive and regularly updated with exam news and resources.
  3. No privacy or cookie banners detected, indicating partial privacy compliance.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via contact page only.
  5. No advanced security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. Use of Baidu push script indicates SEO and indexing efforts.
  7. Domain is newly registered but content is professional and consistent.
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and custom JavaScript and CSS files. The HTML structure is valid and includes appropriate meta tags for SEO. The site loads external scripts from Baidu for SEO push, indicating focus on search engine indexing. Hosting details are not explicit, but the domain registrar is July Name Limited. Performance is moderate with no evident critical issues, though mobile optimization is basic and could be improved. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The CMS is not identified, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack by adopting newer frameworks and improving mobile responsiveness and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cjviry.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cjviry.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.