Skip to main content

Security report for cityprotect.ca

Government · Canada

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CityProtect is a government-focused public safety platform likely operated under the umbrella of Motorola Solutions. The website uses modern web technologies including Angular and AWS hosting infrastructure, integrating multiple trusted third-party services such as ArcGIS and Google Analytics. The platform appears targeted at government agencies and public safety organizations, providing community protection and incident management services. The domain is relatively new, registered in 2019, and uses privacy protection for WHOIS data, which is standard for corporate domains. Security posture is good with HTTPS and a strong Content-Security-Policy, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no visible privacy or cookie policies were found in the provided HTML snapshot. No contact information or legal policies were detected, which limits transparency and compliance indicators. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve in privacy compliance and public security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cityprotect.ca

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
55
Email security
45
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cityprotect.ca, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for cityprotect.ca right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CityProtect operates in the government sector providing technology solutions for public safety and community protection. Its business model is B2G, serving municipal and government agencies. The platform benefits from association with Motorola Solutions, a recognized leader in public safety technology, which enhances its market position and credibility. The website references partner domains such as CommandCentral, indicating an ecosystem of integrated services. The company is relatively young, founded in 2019, and targets a niche market with specialized services. Revenue streams likely include software licensing and service contracts with government entities. The lack of visible contact or policy information on the website suggests a focus on authenticated users or internal stakeholders rather than public consumer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy restricting resource loading to trusted domains. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice to protect against DNS spoofing. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The absence of visible contact information for incident response or security policies reduces readiness indicators. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a government-focused platform but could be enhanced by adding DNSSEC, publishing security policies, and providing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and trust.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR and privacy compliance.
  3. Add visible contact information including security incident response channels.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Enhance security headers by adding HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
CityProtect is a platform related to public safety and community protection, likely serving government or municipal sectors with technology solutions.
Key services
Community safety platform, Public safety data integration, Incident reporting and management
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AWS DNS hosting, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, ArcGIS, Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Visual Studio, Tealium, TrustArc
Frameworks
Angular
Platforms
AWS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Content-Security-Policy header with restrictive sources
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by domain and external resources)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
google-analytics.com, trustarc.com, tealiumiq.com
Marketing tools
Tealium
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern Angular framework with modular scripts.
  2. Content is minimal in the HTML snapshot but likely rendered dynamically.
  3. No visible contact information or legal policies in the provided HTML snapshot.
  4. Strong Content-Security-Policy header with multiple trusted domains.
  5. Domain is registered with Tucows and uses AWS DNS services.
  6. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  7. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  8. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in the HTML snapshot.
  9. No forms or input fields detected in the provided HTML content.
  10. Social media links are embedded via scripts but no explicit anchor tags found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular framework with modular JavaScript files loaded as ES modules. Hosting is on AWS infrastructure with DNS managed by AWS Route 53. The site uses Google Fonts and integrates multiple third-party services including ArcGIS for mapping, Google Analytics for tracking, and TrustArc for privacy compliance tools. The Content-Security-Policy is well configured to restrict resource loading to trusted domains. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no advanced optimization detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but present. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or SPA architecture. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for a government technology platform but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cityprotect.ca. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cityprotect.ca.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.