Skip to main content

Security report for cityprosecutordoughaubert.com

Long Beach City Prosecutor Doug Haubert · Government · United States

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Long Beach City Prosecutor Doug Haubert website serves as the official online presence for the city prosecutor's office responsible for prosecuting adult misdemeanor crimes within Long Beach, California. The site provides comprehensive information about prosecutorial services, community programs, diversion initiatives, and resources for victims and residents. It targets local residents and community stakeholders, positioning itself as a trusted government service provider. The business model is public service under the government sector, with a medium-sized operational scope and a founding date consistent with the domain registration in 2011. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Google Language Translator, hosted by GoDaddy. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, with a clean and professional design. SEO practices are adequately implemented, though accessibility features are basic. The presence of multiple external domains, some suspicious, suggests potential security review is warranted. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which could be improved. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and trustworthy for its intended government service role but would benefit from enhanced security measures and privacy compliance to strengthen its posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cityprosecutordoughaubert.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a government prosecutorial office with a clear mandate to serve the Long Beach community. Its market position is that of an essential public service provider with no direct commercial competition. The business model is non-commercial, funded by government resources. Key services include prosecution of misdemeanors, community outreach, victim support, and complaint handling. The target audience is local residents and stakeholders in Long Beach. The site shows moderate digital maturity with room for improvement in privacy and security compliance. The presence of social media channels indicates engagement efforts. The suspicious external links may be artifacts or require cleanup to maintain reputation. No parent or subsidiary companies are indicated, consistent with a government entity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced, which is mandatory. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance risk. No dedicated incident response or abuse contact information is provided, which is a gap in security readiness. The presence of suspicious external domains linked from the site could pose risks if not managed. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a government informational site but requires enhancements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other privacy laws.
  4. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts to improve security transparency and readiness.
  5. Audit and remove suspicious or unrelated external links to maintain site integrity and reputation.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Long Beach City Prosecutor Doug Haubert
Description
This office is responsible for prosecuting all adult misdemeanor crimes committed within the City of Long Beach. Examples include battery, theft, vandalism, DUI, drug possession, domestic violence, prostitution, brandishing a weapon, graffiti, hate crimes, and code enforcement.
Key services
Prosecution of adult misdemeanor crimes, Community programs, Diversion programs, Victim and witness information, Public records requests, Complaint submissions (fireworks, tobacco)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Bootstrap CSS, Google Language Translator plugin, Booking plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of clientDeleteProhibited and other domain status flags

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Google Language Translator
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government office site for Long Beach City Prosecutor.
  2. Content is informative and relevant to local residents.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Multiple external domains linked, some suspicious or unrelated, possibly injected or spam links in footer or hidden areas.
  5. Use of WordPress CMS with common plugins.
  6. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
  7. Security headers not explicitly detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  8. Contact information is clearly provided with official email and phone.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response info found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and Google Language Translator plugins, indicating a standard modern web infrastructure. Hosting is provided by GoDaddy, a reputable registrar and hosting provider. The site uses jQuery and Bootstrap for UI components and responsiveness. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization but basic accessibility features. The presence of multiple external scripts and domains, some suspicious, suggests potential technical debt or security risk vectors. The site lacks advanced security configurations such as DNSSEC and security headers. SEO is supported by Yoast with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Overall, the technical stack is typical for a government informational website but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cityprosecutordoughaubert.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cityprosecutordoughaubert.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.