Skip to main content

Security report for circleid.com

CircleID · Telecommunications · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CircleID is a well-established online platform specializing in internet infrastructure news, opinions, and blogs, serving a professional audience since 2002. It holds a strong market position as a trusted source for developments in telecommunications, cybersecurity, and internet governance. The website offers a rich content experience with featured blogs, news briefs, industry updates, and community engagement, supported by reputable sponsors and partners in the internet infrastructure sector. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics, and Font Awesome, delivering fast performance and good SEO optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though it lacks some advanced security headers and a formal vulnerability disclosure mechanism. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy, but the absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a gap. Overall, CircleID demonstrates high business credibility and technical maturity, making it a reliable resource in its domain.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of circleid.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching circleid.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CircleID operates as a content publishing platform targeting internet infrastructure professionals, cybersecurity experts, and policy makers. Its revenue model includes sponsored topics and advertising partnerships with industry leaders such as Verisign, WhoisXML API, and IPv4.Global. The platform fosters a growing community with active discussions and comments, enhancing engagement and market reach. The long domain age and consistent WHOIS data reinforce its legitimacy. CircleID's strategic partnerships and comprehensive content offerings position it well within the telecommunications and technology sectors, with potential for growth through enhanced privacy and security features.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks implementation of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate risks such as clickjacking and cross-site scripting. There is no publicly available incident response or security contact information, nor a vulnerability disclosure policy, which limits transparency in security management. Privacy policy is comprehensive and GDPR compliant, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, potentially impacting compliance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, with room for improvement in formal security governance and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CircleID
Description
CircleID is focused on the Internet infrastructure serving related news, blogs, opinions, and more. The CircleID community consists of savvy and rapidly growing base of professionals.
Key services
Internet infrastructure news, Blogs and opinions, Industry updates, Community engagement, Sponsored content and advertising
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.2.1, Google Analytics, Google Custom Search Engine, Font Awesome 6.6.0, WebFont Loader, CSS3, HTML5
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async and defer for scripts to improve performance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Marketing tools
Google Custom Search Engine
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established platform focused on internet infrastructure news and analysis.
  2. Content is rich, updated, and professionally presented with active community engagement.
  3. Use of reputable external services for analytics and search.
  4. No signs of blocking or WAF interference; content fully accessible.
  5. Lacks explicit cookie consent mechanism despite GDPR compliance in privacy policy.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information published.
  8. Technical implementation is modern with good performance and SEO practices.
Technical notes

Notes

CircleID's technical infrastructure is based on a custom or non-CMS platform using jQuery, Google Analytics, and Google Custom Search Engine for functionality and analytics. The site loads quickly and is optimized for desktop and mobile devices with responsive fonts and layouts. Use of deferred and async script loading improves performance. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. However, the absence of modern JavaScript frameworks or CMS may limit scalability and ease of content management. Hosting details are not explicit, but the presence of Cloudflare Insights suggests CDN usage. Technical risks are low but could be mitigated further by adopting modern security headers and improving accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with circleid.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review circleid.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.