Skip to main content

Security report for cinex.com.br

Cinex · Manufacturing · Brazil

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cinex is a Brazilian manufacturing company with Italian roots specializing in innovative glass and aluminum products for architectural and furniture applications. The company has a strong market presence with over two decades of experience, offering a diverse product portfolio including doors, frames, coatings, and partitions. Their business model focuses on combining technology, design, and sustainability to serve architects, designers, engineers, and end consumers. Technically, the website infrastructure leverages common web technologies such as jQuery, Glider.js, and Typekit fonts, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services. However, the website suffers from critical security shortcomings, notably the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS protocols, which exposes users to significant risks. The company has implemented SPF and DMARC DNS records, indicating some email security awareness. Overall, the digital maturity is moderate with room for improvement in performance, security, and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cinex.com.br

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
85
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cinex operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on architectural and furniture glass and aluminum solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in their blend of Brazilian and Italian design heritage, innovation labs, and a broad product range. The company targets professional segments such as architects, designers, engineers, as well as final consumers and retailers. Revenue streams likely include direct product sales, partnerships with franchises, and training services. The company maintains a multi-channel presence including social media and newsletters, enhancing customer engagement. Partnerships with digital agencies and retail platforms support their market reach. Growth indicators include a well-maintained portfolio and innovation centers. Strategic observations suggest a focus on design excellence and sustainability as key differentiators.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS support, which is a critical vulnerability for any modern website. While DNS records show proper SPF and DMARC configurations, enhancing email security, the absence of DNSSEC and CAA records reduces DNS security robustness. No security headers are detected, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, indicating immature security governance. Tracking technologies and marketing tools are extensively used without visible cookie consent mechanisms, raising privacy compliance concerns. The website is vulnerable to interception and man-in-the-middle attacks due to missing TLS protocols. Overall, the security maturity is low, posing risks to user data and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate immediately to enable HTTPS and protect user data.
  2. Implement modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and disable all insecure protocols to strengthen transport security.
  3. Add and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  5. Establish and communicate an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard web technology stack including jQuery 3.5.1, Glider.js for UI components, and Adobe Typekit for fonts. It integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Pinterest Tag, and RD Station Marketing. Hosting and DNS services are provided by Cloudflare, ensuring reliable DNS resolution but no DNSSEC. Performance metrics indicate slow load times and a large page size, suggesting optimization opportunities. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but present. The absence of a CMS or framework is noted, implying a custom or static site architecture. Technical debt is evident in the lack of SSL/TLS and security headers, which should be prioritized to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cinex.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cinex.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.