Skip to main content

Security report for cimice.eu

Obec Čímice · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Obec Čímice operates an official municipal website serving a small community in the Czech Republic, providing local government information, public notices, and tourist information. The site targets local citizens and visitors, offering essential services such as contact forms and community updates. The business model is typical for a local government entity, focusing on transparency and public service. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies including jQuery, Flexslider, and Font Awesome, with a cookie consent mechanism implemented via CookieScript. While the site is functional and well-structured with good navigation and mobile optimization, it lacks a publicly accessible privacy policy and security headers, which are important for compliance and security posture. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy protection, common for small organizations, but the website content and contact details support legitimacy. Overall, the site is trustworthy but could improve security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cimice.eu

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Obec Čímice as a local government authority providing essential information and services to residents and tourists. It leverages partnerships with regional sites such as ŠumavaNet.CZ and the Plzeňský kraj regional office, indicating integration within local government networks. The business model is non-commercial, focused on public administration and community engagement. The presence of a Google Forms survey indicates efforts to gather community feedback. The site does not engage in advertising or affiliate marketing, maintaining a public service orientation. Growth indicators are limited due to the nature of the entity, but the digital presence is adequate for its size and purpose.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture. It uses HTTPS (implied by external Google Analytics scripts loaded over HTTPS), but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. The cookie consent mechanism is robust, offering granular control and transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. However, the absence of a privacy policy and security policy pages, as well as lack of incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. The site would benefit from implementing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and publishing formal privacy and security policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong TLS configuration and HSTS header.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and security policy pages accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  4. Establish and publish incident response contact information for security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Obec Čímice
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Obec Čímice
Description
Official website of the municipal office of Čímice, a village in the Pošumaví region near Sušice and Horažďovice, providing information for citizens and tourists.
Key services
Municipal information, Public notices, Local news and updates, Tourist information, Contact and inquiry form
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Flexslider, Font Awesome 5.5, Google Fonts, CookieScript Consent Management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with granular control
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official municipal site for Obec Čímice in Czech Republic.
  2. Content is in Czech language with local government focus.
  3. No privacy policy page found, but cookie consent is implemented.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy restrictions.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS info provided; security posture moderate.
  7. Uses common web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No social media links found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery, jQuery UI, Flexslider for sliders, and Font Awesome for icons. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site includes a cookie consent management platform (CookieScript) with detailed cookie declarations and user consent controls. The HTML is well-structured with meta tags for SEO and accessibility features such as ARIA labels and alt attributes. The site is mobile responsive with media queries and viewport meta tags. Performance is moderate, with multiple CSS and JS files loaded, but no explicit performance optimization techniques detected. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the data. The site could benefit from modernization with newer frameworks and improved accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cimice.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cimice.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.