Skip to main content

Security report for cil.pt

fruits GmbH · E-commerce · Germany

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

fruits GmbH operates a specialized e-commerce platform focused on the sale of premium domain names, exemplified by the listing of cil.pt. The platform emphasizes secure transactions through escrow services and offers flexible payment options such as lease-to-own. The website is built on a modern React and Next.js stack, integrating trusted payment processors like Stripe and analytics tools including PostHog and Google Tag Manager. The site demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and accessibility, contributing to a positive user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent. Privacy compliance is partial, with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the domain registration details align well with the business, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
3/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cil.pt

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
3
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets buyers and sellers of premium domains, positioning itself as a secure and user-friendly marketplace with buyer protection programs. Revenue streams include domain sales and lease-to-own plans. Partnerships with Seo.Domains and MeUp.com enhance market reach. The platform's transparent fee structure and escrow services provide competitive advantages. Growth indicators include active domain listings and customer testimonials. The company operates primarily in Germany, serving a global audience interested in premium domains.

Security posture

The website maintains a solid security foundation with HTTPS, security headers, and secure payment integrations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms may pose GDPR compliance risks. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly documented, suggesting areas for improvement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Add explicit contact channels for security incidents (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention and user rights.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
fruits GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
fruits GmbH
Description
fruits GmbH operates an online platform for buying and selling premium domain names, offering secure payment and quick domain transfer services. The site cil.pt is a premium domain listed for sale via fruits.co.
Key services
Premium domain sales, Domain transfer facilitation, Escrow payment service, Lease-to-own domain purchase option
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Stripe, Google Tag Manager, PostHog, Sentry
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
fruits.co
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure payment integration via Stripe
  • Escrow service for buyer protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
PostHog, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
PostHog, Sentry
Marketing tools
PostHog
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a premium domain sales platform operated by fruits GmbH.
  2. Secure payment and buyer protection are emphasized.
  3. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed on the page.
  4. Contact primarily via email and chat interface.
  5. No cookie consent banner detected despite GDPR relevance.
  6. Modern tech stack with React and Next.js.
  7. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  9. WHOIS data consistent with website claims and business location.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses a modern and performant tech stack with React and Next.js, ensuring fast loading and excellent mobile responsiveness. Integration with Stripe for payments and PostHog for analytics indicates a mature digital infrastructure. SEO and accessibility practices are well implemented. No technical debt or outdated libraries were identified in the provided content. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the site is well optimized for performance and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cil.pt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cil.pt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.