Skip to main content

Security report for cienciavitae.pt

CIÊNCIAVITAE · Government · Portugal

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CIÊNCIAVITAE is a Portuguese national platform dedicated to managing scientific curricula, providing visibility and integration of researchers' academic and scientific information. The platform serves students, researchers, and institutions, offering tools for CV creation, visualization, and institutional management. It is supported by Portuguese governmental and European funding entities, positioning it as a trusted and authoritative resource in the national scientific ecosystem. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Fonts, and incorporates GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent management but lacks explicit security headers and published incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website presents a professional, trustworthy, and compliant digital presence aligned with its governmental and scientific mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cienciavitae.pt

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche in the government and education sectors, focusing on scientific research management. Its business model revolves around providing a centralized, standardized CV management system for the Portuguese scientific community. The site’s partnerships with government and funding bodies enhance its credibility and market position. The target audience includes secondary and higher education students, researchers, and institutions, indicating a broad user base within the academic and scientific fields. The platform’s integration capabilities and institutional modules suggest a scalable and service-oriented approach. The presence of detailed privacy and cookie policies reflects a mature compliance posture. However, the absence of direct contact information and security policies could be improved to enhance user trust and operational transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid baseline security posture with enforced HTTPS and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, which is a potential area for improvement. The absence of visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data is positive. However, the lack of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness perception. The use of standard WordPress plugins and libraries appears up-to-date with no known vulnerabilities. Recommendations include implementing security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), publishing a security policy, and providing incident response contact channels to strengthen the security posture and compliance with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and incident response procedures.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CIÊNCIAVITAE
Description
Sistema nacional de gestão curricular de ciência baseado na plataforma tecnológica DeGóis, que facilita a gestão do currículo científico, dando maior visibilidade aos utilizadores.
Key services
Editor de CV, Visualizador de CVs de investigadores, Módulo Institucional para gestão de investigadores
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Fonts (Montserrat), Font Awesome, Google Analytics, Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
AddThis
Marketing tools
AddThis
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Portuguese with English language option available.
  3. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie consent regulations.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of standard WordPress plugins and technologies.
  7. Clear governmental and institutional backing indicated by logos and partner links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Fonts, and Font Awesome. It uses the Complianz GDPR plugin for cookie consent management and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and good SEO practices including meta tags and language alternates. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML content. The technical stack is modern and widely supported, though hosting provider details are not disclosed. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cienciavitae.pt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cienciavitae.pt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.