Skip to main content

Security report for ciberseguras.org

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ciberseguras.org is a Spanish-language community platform dedicated to feminist digital security, offering educational resources, protection guides, and organizational tools for feminist and women-focused groups. The website operates as a small non-profit entity, providing valuable content and a blog to engage its audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with standard web technologies like jQuery and CSS, hosted by a feminist-friendly provider, Cl4ndestina. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers, which could be improved to enhance security posture. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies, which is a notable gap for GDPR compliance. Overall, the site is trustworthy and serves its niche well but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Twitter

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ciberseguras.org

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform targets feminist communities interested in technology and digital security, positioning itself as a niche educational resource. Its business model is non-commercial, focusing on community empowerment rather than revenue generation. The site maintains a consistent brand and content quality, with a clear focus on education and protection. Partnerships appear limited but include hosting by Cl4ndestina. The absence of commercial advertising or tracking tools aligns with its community-oriented mission. Growth indicators include an active blog and resource updates, though the site could expand its reach with improved privacy and security transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer lock in place. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduce its defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The site does not appear to use tracking or analytics that could expose user data. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish an incident response contact or security policy page to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities and maintain security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Espacio para aprender, protegernos y organizarnos juntas, con recursos sobre tecnología y feminismos, protección de dispositivos y organización de espacios de encuentro.
Key services
Educational materials on technology and feminism, Resources for device protection, Guidance for organizing community spaces, Blog with reflections and news
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, WordPress, PHP, CSS3, HTML5
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based community resource focused on feminist digital security.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact email provided but no phone or physical address.
  4. No visible security headers or advanced security policies implemented.
  5. No advertising or tracking services detected.
  6. Content is in Spanish and targeted at Spanish-speaking feminist communities.
  7. Site uses HTTPS and is hosted by a feminist hosting provider (Cl4ndestina).
  8. WHOIS data shows domain is stable and not privacy protected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS with jQuery and standard CSS for styling. It loads resources from its own domain and WordPress core domains, with no third-party advertising or analytics detected. The site is hosted by Cl4ndestina, a feminist hosting provider, which aligns with the site's mission. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations noted. Mobile optimization is good, and the site uses responsive design. Accessibility is basic but present. SEO is basic with meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site could benefit from modern JavaScript frameworks or performance enhancements but is adequate for its purpose.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ciberseguras.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ciberseguras.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.