Skip to main content

Security report for ciap-pdl.fr

Coopérative d'Installation en Agriculture Paysanne Pays de la Loire · Other · France

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CIAP Pays de la Loire is a cooperative dedicated to supporting agricultural installation projects in the Pays de la Loire region of France. The organization offers key services including a one-year creative farmer training program, activity incubation (portage d’activités), and permanent test spaces for aspiring farmers. The cooperative aims to secure project leaders, involve local authorities, and promote sustainable peasant agriculture. The website reflects a regional cooperative with a clear mission to facilitate agricultural entrepreneurship and innovation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and several plugins for enhanced functionality, including GDPR compliance and analytics. Hosting is provided by OVH, a reputable provider. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. However, some security headers are missing, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Security posture is moderate with best practices like HTTPS and reCAPTCHA in place, but improvements are recommended in security headers and formal policies. Privacy compliance is partial due to the absence of a visible privacy policy page, though cookie consent is implemented. Business credibility is high, supported by consistent domain registration, professional content, and social media presence. Overall, the website is a trustworthy and professional platform for its niche cooperative, with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ciap-pdl.fr

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The cooperative operates in the agricultural sector, focusing on sustainable and innovative farming installations. Its business model revolves around cooperative support services including training, incubation, and local integration. The target market includes individuals and groups in the Pays de la Loire region seeking to establish agricultural projects. The cooperative leverages partnerships with local authorities and maintains an active presence through social media and regional events. Growth indicators include a steady domain age and active content updates. The cooperative's competitive advantage lies in its regional focus and comprehensive support offerings tailored to agricultural entrepreneurs.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA to protect forms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a gap. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is partial, with cookie consent implemented but no visible privacy policy. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced by adopting additional headers, formal policies, and regular security audits.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a visible security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Ensure all forms have CSRF protection and robust input validation to prevent injection attacks.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Coopérative d'Installation en Agriculture Paysanne Pays de la Loire
Description
The CIAP Pays de la Loire is a cooperative supporting agricultural installation projects, offering training, activity incubation, and permanent test spaces to help individuals establish sustainable agricultural businesses in the Pays de la Loire region.
Key services
Formation Paysan Créatif (Creative Farmer Training), Portage d’activités (Activity Incubation), Espaces tests permanents (Permanent Test Spaces), Certification professionnelle, Local departmental CIAP support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, YouTube iframe API, reCAPTCHA, Sydney Toolbox plugin, Premium Addons for Elementor, Ocean Extra plugin, Happy Elementor Addons, Burst Statistics plugin, Complianz GDPR plugin
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Elementor page builder
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security/statistics plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Burst Statistics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Burst Statistics
Marketing tools
Burst Statistics, Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is relevant and focused on agricultural project support in Pays de la Loire.
  3. No privacy policy page explicitly found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Complianz GDPR plugin.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of modern WordPress plugins and technologies.
  7. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Facebook is linked.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Domain registration and hosting are consistent and legitimate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with Elementor page builder and multiple plugins enhancing functionality such as GDPR compliance (Complianz), analytics (Burst Statistics), and UI components (Happy Elementor Addons). Hosting is provided by OVH, a reputable provider. The site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and loads external scripts asynchronously to improve performance. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are evident through meta tags and structured content. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in image loading and script management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ciap-pdl.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ciap-pdl.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.