Skip to main content

Security report for chronotopes.net

Chronotopes · Other · Denmark

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Chronotopes is a small, newly established art gallery based in Copenhagen, focusing on exhibitions and open calls such as 'Moons, Castles, Trees | The Wrong Biennale | AI Chronotopes'. The website is built on WordPress and uses Matomo analytics with cookies disabled, indicating some privacy awareness. The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare DNS and hosting via One.com, with HTTPS enabled but lacking DNSSEC and security headers. The site lacks contact information and advanced privacy compliance features, which limits trust and user engagement. Overall, the website presents a professional design and relevant content for its niche audience but requires improvements in security and compliance to enhance credibility.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of chronotopes.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching chronotopes.net

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the art gallery sector, targeting artists and art enthusiasts primarily in Copenhagen. Its business model revolves around organizing exhibitions and open calls, leveraging digital presence for outreach. The market position is niche and local with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. The website content and metadata reflect a consistent brand identity. However, the absence of contact details and formal policies may hinder growth and trust-building. The use of Matomo analytics suggests a preference for privacy-conscious tools. The domain age aligns with the business's recent foundation, indicating a startup phase.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and Matomo configured to disable cookies, reducing tracking risks. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies indicates gaps in defense-in-depth. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user interaction. The lack of incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies further weakens security maturity. Overall, the site is low risk but would benefit from implementing standard security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security-related documentation to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance browser security.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Develop and publish security and incident response policies to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Chronotopes
Description
Chronotopes is an art gallery based in Copenhagen offering exhibitions and open calls, including events like 'Moons, Castles, Trees | The Wrong Biennale | AI Chronotopes'.
Key services
Art exhibitions, Open calls for artists
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, Matomo Analytics, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data
  • Disable cookies in Matomo tracking

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
All in One SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based art gallery site with a focus on exhibitions and open calls.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies exist but lack advanced compliance features like consent mechanisms.
  4. No terms of service or security policies published.
  5. No forms detected that collect user data.
  6. Matomo analytics used with cookies disabled, indicating some privacy consideration.
  7. No social media links or external business contact points found.
  8. No security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  9. Domain is very new, consistent with the website content and business age.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with a modern theme and plugins including All in One SEO and Matomo analytics. Hosting is via One.com with DNS managed by Cloudflare, providing reliable infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security configuration. No forms or interactive elements reduce complexity but also limit engagement. Overall, the technical stack is appropriate for a small art gallery but could be enhanced with improved security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with chronotopes.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review chronotopes.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.