Skip to main content

Security report for chrochtik.cz

Růžolící Chrochtík s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Růžolící Chrochtík s.r.o. is a small Czech graphic design studio and advertising agency, as indicated by the website title and meta description. The website serves primarily as a landing page with an animation and redirects users to the /home page. The technical infrastructure uses common frontend technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, and bxSlider, along with Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site has basic mobile optimization and accessibility features but lacks advanced SEO and performance optimizations. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating some level of privacy compliance, but no privacy policy or terms of service pages were found. Contact information is absent, limiting business credibility and user trust. WHOIS data is unavailable, which negatively impacts domain legitimacy assessment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching chrochtik.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the graphic design and advertising sector targeting a general audience in the Czech Republic. The business model appears to be service-oriented, focusing on graphic design, desktop publishing (DTP), and advertising services. The website does not provide detailed information about market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships. The lack of contact details and business verification information limits transparency and trust. The company seems to be a small entity without visible subsidiaries or parent companies. The use of standard web technologies and Google Tag Manager suggests a basic digital marketing approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage and a cookie consent banner. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected. There are no visible forms to assess secure input handling. The absence of privacy and security policies, as well as contact channels for incident response, indicates gaps in compliance and security readiness. The missing WHOIS data further reduces trust in the domain's legitimacy. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, publish privacy and security policies, and improve transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance security posture.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and mitigate risks.
  5. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Růžolící Chrochtík s.r.o.
Description
Garfické studio a reklamní agentura
Key services
grafika, dtp, reklamní agentura
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, bxSlider, blueimp Gallery, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • HTTPS implied by Google Tag Manager script loaded via https

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple landing page with animation and redirect to /home.
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust assessment.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented with Czech language and link to cookie policy.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected.
  5. No contact information such as emails, phone numbers, or addresses found in the HTML content.
  6. No forms detected on the landing page.
  7. Uses common frontend libraries and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  8. No explicit security headers or advanced security features detected.
  9. Website content is minimal and primarily in Czech language.
  10. No social media links or external business-related links found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard frontend technology stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, Font Awesome for icons, and bxSlider and blueimp Gallery for image sliders and galleries. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site loads scripts and styles locally except for Google Tag Manager. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced optimization. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML content. The site lacks structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags beyond basic meta tags.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with chrochtik.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review chrochtik.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.