Skip to main content

Security report for christensenhymas.com

Good Guys Injury Law · Other · United States

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Good Guys Injury Law is a well-established personal injury law firm operating primarily in Utah, with multiple office locations and a strong regional presence. The firm specializes in personal injury cases including car accidents, truck accidents, wrongful death, bicycle accidents, dog bites, and pedestrian accidents. Their business model is client-focused with a no-fee guarantee until successful compensation is secured. The website reflects a professional and trustworthy brand with comprehensive content, client testimonials, and recognized legal certifications. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and security headers, though improvements are recommended in DNSSEC and privacy compliance. Overall, the domain registration and website content align well, indicating a legitimate and credible business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching christensenhymas.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm targets Utah residents who have suffered personal injuries and seeks to provide accessible legal representation with a contingency fee model. Their market position is strong locally, supported by multiple offices and a broad range of personal injury practice areas. The website's content strategy includes educational resources, case results, and community involvement, enhancing client trust and engagement. The firm leverages social media and video testimonials to build credibility. While no direct revenue data is available, the firm's longevity and client volume suggest a stable business. Partnerships appear limited to social media and marketing platforms, with no detected subsidiaries or parent companies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps that could be addressed to enhance trust and compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The use of third-party scripts for analytics and marketing is standard but requires ongoing monitoring. Privacy compliance is partial, with no cookie consent mechanism detected, which may expose the firm to regulatory risks in certain jurisdictions.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Good Guys Injury Law
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Good Guys Injury Law
Description
Good Guys Injury Law provides personal injury legal services in Utah, helping clients with claims related to accidents, injuries, and wrongful death.
Key services
Personal injury claims, Car accidents, Truck accidents, Wrongful death, Bicycle accidents, Dog bites, Pedestrian accidents
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Vimeo Player, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA script

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
ClickCease
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Intaker Chat Widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional legal services site focused on personal injury law in Utah.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and includes multiple trust signals such as testimonials and certifications.
  3. Uses modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  4. No privacy or cookie consent banner detected, which may be a compliance gap.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and various analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel. The site uses Cloudflare for DNS management but does not have DNSSEC enabled. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices implemented via Yoast SEO. The site includes rich structured data (JSON-LD) for legal services and reviews, enhancing search engine visibility. Some technical debt is evident in the lack of cookie consent and partial accessibility features, which could be improved to meet modern standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with christensenhymas.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review christensenhymas.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.