Skip to main content

Security report for chloes.website

Other · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Chloe's Website is a personal and community-focused site that provides links to a blog, gallery, donation page, and visitor information. The site also features numerous external links to related personal and community websites, many of which reflect LGBTQ+ and transgender/non-binary themes. The website appears to serve as a hub for personal expression and community engagement rather than a commercial business. Technically, the site is built with straightforward HTML and CSS, validated by W3C badges, and hosted under a domain registered with Porkbun, LLC. However, the WHOIS data shows a suspicious future creation date, which raises concerns about the accuracy or legitimacy of the domain registration information. Security posture is minimal, with no detected security headers or privacy policies, and no analytics or tracking services are present, indicating a privacy-conscious but basic security setup. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and consistent branding, but lacks formal business and compliance information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: RDP

      Port 3389 (RDP) is publicly accessible - RDP - Remote Desktop, prime ransomware target

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to RDP using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching chloes.website

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a small-scale personal or community platform without clear commercial intent or formal business structure. It targets a general audience interested in LGBTQ+ community content and personal blogging. The business model is non-commercial, relying on donations and community engagement. There is no evidence of revenue streams, certifications, or partnerships beyond informal link exchanges with related personal sites. The site’s market position is niche and personal, with no indication of competitive positioning or growth strategies. The partnership ecosystem is informal and community-driven. The lack of contact information and formal policies limits business credibility and trust signals.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is low. There are no visible security headers, no HTTPS enforcement information provided, and no privacy or cookie policies to indicate compliance with GDPR or other regulations. The domain registration data is suspicious due to a future creation date, which undermines trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The site does not use analytics or tracking, which reduces privacy risks but also limits security monitoring capabilities. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing basic security best practices such as enabling HTTPS, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and clarifying contact information for incident response.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Clarify and publish contact information including security incident response contacts.
  5. Investigate and correct the suspicious WHOIS domain creation date to improve legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal or community website featuring links to blog, gallery, donation page, and visitor information. Also includes links to related personal or community sites and buttons representing various interests and affiliations.
Key services
Blog, Gallery, Donation, Visitor Information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal/community site with multiple external links to related personal and community sites.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found.
  4. No forms detected on the main page.
  5. No social media links except a rel=me link to a Mastodon profile.
  6. No scripts or external JavaScript libraries detected.
  7. Site uses valid HTML and CSS validation badges.
  8. No security headers or explicit HTTPS enforcement detected from provided data.
  9. No analytics or tracking services detected.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML5 and CSS3 technologies with no detected JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms. The site is validated for HTML and CSS standards, indicating good technical implementation. Hosting appears to be managed through Porkbun, LLC, which also provides DNS services. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal but present through meta viewport and title tags. There is no evidence of technical debt or complex infrastructure, but modernization opportunities include adding HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and structured data for SEO and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with chloes.website. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review chloes.website.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.