Skip to main content

Security report for chi-athenaeum.org

The Chicago Athenaeum · Other · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Chicago Athenaeum is an established international museum dedicated to architecture and design, based in Chicago, USA. It offers exhibitions, design awards, educational programs, and publications aimed at promoting the value of good design across multiple disciplines. The museum targets design professionals, students, and the general public interested in architecture and design. The website reflects a medium-sized non-profit institution with a consistent brand and a clear mission. Technically, the website uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.11.0 along with plugins for slideshows and fancybox. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced accessibility features and modern frameworks. SEO is basic but present through meta tags and Open Graph data. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for GDPR compliance. The WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, which reduces transparency and trust slightly. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Contact information is clearly displayed, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve in technical modernization, security best practices, and privacy compliance to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching chi-athenaeum.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Chicago Athenaeum holds a strong market position as a reputable museum and authority in architecture and design awards. Its business model focuses on non-profit educational and cultural services, including exhibitions, awards, and publications. Revenue streams likely include memberships, sponsorships, and event participation. The target customer segments include architects, designers, students, and design enthusiasts globally. The organization maintains a partnership ecosystem through social media and international design communities. Growth indicators include ongoing award programs and international recognition. Strategic observations suggest opportunities in digital modernization and enhanced privacy compliance to maintain competitive advantage.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The use of HTTPS is a positive baseline, but the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security is a gap. The website does not expose sensitive data in HTML, which is good. However, the use of outdated JavaScript libraries like jQuery 1.11.0 may introduce vulnerabilities. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which limits readiness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security culture appears basic and could benefit from formalized policies and technical improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Upgrade JavaScript libraries and plugins to their latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent banner and update privacy policies to ensure full GDPR compliance and improve user trust.
  4. Publish clear security and incident response policies, including vulnerability disclosure information, to demonstrate security maturity and transparency.
  5. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility features to improve user experience and meet modern web standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Chicago Athenaeum
Description
The Chicago Athenaeum is an International Museum of Architecture and Design based in Chicago, dedicated to the art of design across multiple disciplines including architecture, industrial and product design, graphics, landscape architecture, and urban planning. Its mission is to advance public education about the value of Good Design and its positive impact on the human environment.
Key services
Museum exhibitions, Design awards and recognitions, Educational programs, Publications, Membership and community engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.0, jQuery Cycle2 plugin, jQuery Fancybox, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by base href https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about architecture and design awards.
  2. No security challenge or blocking detected.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, limiting domain registration transparency.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. No cookie consent or GDPR compliance mechanisms detected.
  6. Use of outdated jQuery version (1.11.0) may pose security risks.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter, LinkedIn.
  9. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure relies on legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.11.0 and plugins for slideshows and modal displays. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking user behavior. The HTML structure is valid with proper meta tags and Open Graph data, supporting basic SEO. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in mobile optimization and accessibility. There is no detected CMS or modern framework, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Technical risks include outdated libraries and lack of security headers, which could impact business operations if exploited.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with chi-athenaeum.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review chi-athenaeum.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.