Skip to main content

Security report for ces.tech

Consumer Technology Association (CTA) · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Consumer Technology Association (CTA) operates the CES website, promoting the globally recognized CES event, a leading technology trade show. The website serves as a comprehensive platform for event information, registration, exhibitor resources, and attendee guides, targeting technology professionals, media, and international participants. The business model centers on event organization and industry networking, positioning CES as a premier technology innovation showcase. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript frameworks, extensive marketing and analytics tools, and demonstrates excellent performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers, though explicit security and incident response policies are not publicly detailed. Privacy compliance is evident with privacy and cookie policies, including consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with the business identity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ces.tech

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CES is a flagship event of the Consumer Technology Association, serving as a critical platform for technology companies to showcase innovations and connect with partners. The event attracts a large, diverse audience including exhibitors, media, and international attendees. The business leverages partnerships with registration service providers and employs extensive digital marketing and tracking to maximize reach. The website content and structure support a robust event ecosystem, with clear navigation for various user types. The organization's market position is strong, with clear trust signals and consistent branding. Revenue streams likely include exhibitor fees, sponsorships, and attendee registrations. Growth indicators include detailed guides and expanded digital content offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and secure form implementations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts introduces potential privacy risks, though these are common in event marketing. GDPR compliance is indicated via privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is high but could be improved by publishing dedicated security and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security controls and practices.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Add explicit data protection officer contact information to enhance GDPR compliance transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Consumer Technology Association (CTA)
Description
CES® is the most powerful tech event in the world — the proving ground for breakthrough technologies and global innovators. Owned and produced by the Consumer Technology Association (CTA)®, CES is the only trade show that showcases the entire tech landscape at one event.
Key services
Technology trade shows, Exhibitor services, Attendee registration, Conference programs, Media and speaker engagement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Facebook Pixel, Reddit Pixel, Clinch Pixel
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper input types

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Bing Ads Insights, LinkedIn Analytics, Twitter Analytics, Facebook Analytics, Reddit Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Google Ads, Twitter Ads, Facebook Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Reddit Pixel, Clinch Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and targeted to technology industry stakeholders.
  3. Strong use of tracking and marketing technologies for event promotion.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed; contact via forms.
  6. Security posture is strong but lacks explicit published security and incident response policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript framework likely React, with SPA-like navigation and dynamic content loading. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics platforms including Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads, LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, and Clinch pixels. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is fast with efficient media usage and deferred script loading. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience but should monitor third-party script security continuously.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ces.tech. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ces.tech.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.