Skip to main content

Security report for ceresit.ua

Henkel · Manufacturing · Ukraine

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ceresit.ua is the Ukrainian localized website for the Ceresit brand, a part of Henkel, specializing in adhesives and construction chemicals. The site targets construction professionals and consumers in Ukraine, offering product information and contact channels. The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging modern web technologies and tracking tools such as Adobe Analytics and OpenTelemetry. It demonstrates good digital maturity with fast performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility features. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, although dedicated security and incident response policies are not publicly available. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ceresit.ua

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Henkel, a large multinational manufacturing company, operates Ceresit as a key brand in the construction chemicals sector. The website supports both B2B and B2C models, providing product catalogs and contact forms. The presence of multiple country-specific domains indicates a broad regional footprint. The business benefits from strong brand recognition and consistent branding across markets. The use of advanced CMS and analytics tools suggests a focus on digital marketing and customer engagement. No direct revenue or financial data is disclosed, but the site supports lead generation and customer support functions.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and implements multiple security headers, enhancing protection against common web threats. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No signs of malware or phishing were found, and the domain registration is consistent with the business identity, supporting trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance transparency by listing certifications or compliance attestations if applicable.
  5. Regularly review and update cookie and privacy policies to maintain GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Henkel
Description
Ceresit is a brand under Henkel specializing in adhesives and construction chemicals, offering products for building and renovation.
Key services
adhesives, sealants, construction chemicals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Helix, RAQN API, OneTrust Cookie Consent, OpenTelemetry, JavaScript ES6+
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics, OpenTelemetry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe Analytics, OneTrust
Marketing tools
Adobe Helix RUM, OpenTelemetry
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with strong security headers.
  2. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  3. Website is built on Adobe Experience Manager with modern technologies.
  4. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious content.
  5. Contact information is available including forms, phone, and email.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response page found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS platform, and uses modern JavaScript libraries and APIs for commerce and user management. Performance is optimized with image preloading and adaptive image sizes. The site includes accessibility features and responsive design for mobile devices. Tracking and analytics are implemented with Adobe Analytics and OpenTelemetry, integrated with cookie consent management. Hosting details are not explicit but likely enterprise-grade. The technical stack supports scalability and maintainability, though some scripts and configurations could be further documented for security auditing.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ceresit.ua. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ceresit.ua.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.